Talk:Lookwide Camp

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scouting Low‑importance

	Scouting portal Lookwide Camp is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 06:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Cairn commemorating Lookwide Camp

... that when the Lookwide Camp was announced, the location had not yet been selected?

Source: Gaskell, Erin; AI-assisted reporter (2023-10-18). "Scouts commemorate historical 'Lookwide Camp' with annual night hike". Hexham Courant.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Fredrick Mwenengabo

Converted from a redirect by Evrik (talk) and Horus Kol (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 121 past nominations.

--evrik ^(talk) 05:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

This is an interesting fact about scouting. The article is sourced reliably and covers the Did You Know criteria. Moondragon21 (talk) 02:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A full review is needed as the above review did not check every criterion fully. Also pinging Chipmunkdavis given that they raised an objection to the current hook at WT:DYK. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 16:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - n
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - n
Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The hook is not supported by the cited source. Much of the article is cited to unreliable sources (e.g. zyworld.com or an AI-assisted reporter), sources which have interests in promoting the subject like "1st Hexham Scout Group", or just uncited, like the list in the "Participants" section. The hook is only borderline interesting. As the issues are numerous and the nominator under a lengthy block, I am marking this as rejected. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping to Moondragon21 to inform them of the above review and issues with the article/nomination. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5 My mistake. I apologise. Moondragon21 (talk) 02:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC) 14:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]