Talk:List of unusual deaths/Archive 16
This is an archive of past discussions about List of unusual deaths. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Yes, there are two sources. Yes, both sources use the words "freak accident". But deaths by accidental fall from a roof must be quite common? I suspect that the death has been reported more since she was famous. Does her fame make her death any more unusual than that of, say, a local builder? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) p.s. Rori1911, I'm sure all your edits, since you joined on 5 July, have been made in good faith, but are you aware of Wikipedia:Single-purpose account? Thanks.
- While I do agree that said death isn't all that unusual, it seems like, unless someone makes a case for the sources used being unreliable, our hands are tied on this one. ZionniThePeruser (talk) 03:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- A death from a fall is extremely common, 46,653 Americans died in 2022 from some type of fall. As LiUNA points outhere,
Journalists may use this term to create an attention-grabbing headline or make the story seem more “newsworthy”
and judging by a few of the entries I've seen, journalists indeed seem likely to be overly generous with describing something as a "freak accident" when the circumstances are rather more commonplace than they are suggesting. Looking past the attention grabbing description and looking at the facts themselves, this does not appear to be an unusual death in any way, our hands are not tied just because an anonymous contributor and a campus paper's intern used attention-grabbing verbiage. - Aoidh (talk) 03:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)- I've had it drilled in my head time and time again that Wikipedia goes by what sources say, even if editors believe otherwise. Verifiability, not truth and all that. Wouldn't removing this entry because we don't consider it unusual stray into WP:OR? ZionniThePeruser (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- It scarcely matters because the sources call the death a freak accident anyway, but I think SOPHIE's death was sufficiently unusual because she was a famous (and Wikipedia-notable) person who was taking photographs of the Moon when she fell. Just my two cents. Gildir (talk) 06:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Someone's fame makes their death, however it happens, "more unusual"? Not just "more notable"?? I suspect lots of people take photographs of the moon. Lots of people climb onto roofs with no safety gear. Lots of people fall off. But most of them aren't famous Scottish music producers, songwriters, and DJs. Martinevans123 (talk) 06:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ZionniThePeruser: No, applying Wikipedia policy (WP:ONUS) does not contradict what is written in WP:VNT, particularly the second paragraph of that essay. This verifiability is sourced to two questionable opinion pieces that use this phrase in passing without making an attempt to explain what makes it a freak accident, and sources that have more established reliability do not describe it as such. Omitting such an entry has nothing to do with WP:OR. - Aoidh (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- It scarcely matters because the sources call the death a freak accident anyway, but I think SOPHIE's death was sufficiently unusual because she was a famous (and Wikipedia-notable) person who was taking photographs of the Moon when she fell. Just my two cents. Gildir (talk) 06:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not great sources, are they. The Guardian, used as the source in her article, doesn't say her death was unusual, just that it was a "sudden accident." Martinevans123 (talk) 06:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've had it drilled in my head time and time again that Wikipedia goes by what sources say, even if editors believe otherwise. Verifiability, not truth and all that. Wouldn't removing this entry because we don't consider it unusual stray into WP:OR? ZionniThePeruser (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- A death from a fall is extremely common, 46,653 Americans died in 2022 from some type of fall. As LiUNA points outhere,
- Ooo, tricky. On the one hand, as Zionni points out, the sources call it a freak accident (historically a qualifier for inclusion), and WP:VNT. On the other, the Daily Mail isn't even calling it weird, and they're one of the most likely to sensationalize, so if they're not calling it unusual... It was unexpected and it was unlikely (sounds like she was up on a roof terrace, so I assume people were intended to be on that roof), but I don't know if I personally would call it unusual. Granted my personal opinion is worth about as much as a single baked bean, but still.
- I could be persuaded either way. I do think "freak accident" is a valid qualifier, looking over the other deaths that have used that phrase; I also think this particular "freak accident" isn't really that freaky on the balance of things, and could be trimmed as editorial oversight. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 16:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is tricky. The words "freak accident" might carry more weight in The Daily Telegraph or in The BMJ, than in those two existing sources. They really don't look very 'reliable', do they. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- No Rod Hull?, then no Sophie. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well, he wasn't photographing the moon, he was just "adjusting the television aerial on the roof of his bungalow at half-time during an Inter Milan vs. Manchester United match" (... which is not at all unusual). Martinevans123 (talk) 18:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in mind, Martin, that SOPHIE was transgender, so please use her appropriate pronouns she/her. Using her dead pronouns seems offensive. Rori1911 (talk) 16:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Errm, I was referring to Rod. I've used she/her for Sophie throughout elsewhere here? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in mind, Martin, that SOPHIE was transgender, so please use her appropriate pronouns she/her. Using her dead pronouns seems offensive. Rori1911 (talk) 16:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well, he wasn't photographing the moon, he was just "adjusting the television aerial on the roof of his bungalow at half-time during an Inter Milan vs. Manchester United match" (... which is not at all unusual). Martinevans123 (talk) 18:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Cleopatra
The asp thing started with Shakespeare. It was a poisoned hair pin Whoami313 (talk) 17:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- At least she wasn't killed by having poison poured into her ear while asleep? But, it does happen! Martinevans123 (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Mysterious = Strange or Unusual
I have seen this multiple times on here, but I see that people disregard the word "mysterious" as unusual. However, I found this Collins' dictionary site that states: "Someone or something that is mysterious is strange and is not known about or understood." Also, "strange" is listed as a synonym.
I don't know if this will, in fact, fully settle this debate.
Link: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/mysterious#:~:text=Someone%20or%20something%20that%20is,curious%20More%20Synonyms%20of%20mysterious Rori1911 (talk) 13:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't "mysterious" imply that some or all of the details are unknown, i.e. a mystery? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- By that logic, wouldn't all those listed in List of unsolved deaths and/or List of people who disappeared mysteriously at sea be eligible for inclusion here? ZionniThePeruser (talk) 19:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Catherine Steyer - Jan. 1937
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-morning-call/101133365/
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-gazette/101032333/
https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-news/101135896/
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-herald-sun/101133293/
This is a death I pretty randomly stumbled upon and seems to fit this list to a T, as it looks to me like a very unusual incident that is unique/probably hasn't occurred in that exact manner anywhere else. However, I'm not a reliable source, and since the sources don't explicitly describe it as "unusual", I wanted to check with people before adding this. The best I got is the Gazette or the NY Daily News' describing it as a "bizarre/baffling mystery" (with the Herald-Sun mentioning a "bizarre" trap).
Is this good enough, or should I just forget about it? LaughingManiac (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- i mean the word 'bizarre' could/can count. Chaliceborn777 (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- All right, thanks for the input. Given the discussion above, I'll wait a few days to see if anyone disagrees, then BEBOLD and add this. LaughingManiac (talk) 00:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I gave it a month, and got no other responses. Thus, I've added it, as I stated I would. If anyone has issues with the phrasing, by all means, feel free to correct (or suggest). I tried to be somewhat detailed to emphasize the unusualness of the death, while not dwelling unduly on the minutiae - that said, I understand if someone finds it a little too wordy, or awkwardly presented. LaughingManiac (talk) 19:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
More "first" deaths
Please note that User:Bdblakley29 has recently added four more entries for "first" deaths to the list (Thorvald Eiriksson, 1006; two Dutch sailors, 9 July 1594; unknown man, 15 August 1640; John Gregory Tierney and Harold Connelly, 20 December 1922). I still fail to see how we can include "first" deaths that sources do not explicitly call "strange" or "unusual" without making the list far longer than it now is, nor what other criteria we could use to keep the number of "first" deaths to a reasonable limit. (We ought to consider removing Thomas Selfridge, 17 September 1908, and possibly even the Soyuz 11 crew, for the same reason, whereas some other "first" deaths, such as Bridget Driscoll, are properly sourced as being unusual as well as first-time events.) Gildir (talk) 01:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, if you think we should delete the aforementioned entries then do it. Bdblakley29 (talk) 01:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- The currently agreed criterion makes no mention of "first". We'd need another RfC to agree that. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- I will begin deleting entries for "first" deaths with no sources calling them "unusual" or a synonym and moving "first" deaths with only one source calling them "unusual" to the holding tank. Gildir (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)