Talk:List of cultural references to A Clockwork Orange

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2011. The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete.

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 August 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Symphony No. 9 (Beethoven)#Fourth movement|Ninth Symphony, Fourth Movement]] The anchor (#Fourth movement) has been deleted by other users before.
[[David Bowie#Ziggy Stardust|Ziggy Stardust]] Anchor David Bowie#Ziggy Stardust links to a specific web page: Ziggy Stardust (song). The anchor (#Ziggy Stardust) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Everything2

I'm restoring the Everything2 reference on the grounds that a crappy reference is better than original research. Hopefully this need only be temporary. Any help in cleaning/sourcing the article would be welcomed. — xDanielx^Talk 21:52, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not. A reference to an unreliable source (especially one so spectacularly unreliable) is unacceptable. --Eyrian 00:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

I disagree. Exceptional claims require exceptional sources, and the opposite holds true as well - "A Clockwork Orange has had substantial cultural influences" is the opposite of a contentious/unorthodox claim. A Harvard Law Review article on the subject would be great, but that's not realistic. Perhaps the Everything2 reference was going too far (though the content is moderated). I found the original of the New Zealand Herald article you deleted, so in an attempt to compromise I'll just restore that and leave the others out. If you want to improve the article (I can't help suspecting that you have the opposite intention) then I suggest you help with the sourcing instead of reverting every edit that you can possibly find an excuse for reverting. — xDanielx^Talk 03:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I frankly don't believe that the article as it stands can be improved, and I am not going to waste my time trying to do so. Every single citation added has been around the fact that it has been important, with no additional context. That simply doesn't justify a separate article. And, certainly, the gaggle of trivial references that comprise the main article body aren't worth trying to source. The best way to improve this article is to delete it and start over. --Eyrian 04:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Let's please keep the AfD discussion to the AfD page. — xDanielx^Talk 04:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serious accusations need to be answered. --Eyrian 16:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but not here. Proof by assertion is not an acceptable strategy for AfD debates. — xDanielx ^T/_C 18:01, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:A-songbird-orange.png

Image:A-songbird-orange.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Duffless.jpg

The image Image:Duffless.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Point of view

In an effort to promote neutral point of view, I would suggest arranging lists of references either in chronological or alphabetical order. If someone needs to add a new reference, is the addition made to the top of the list or the bottom? I do not have the desire to rearrange every list I see but would adhere to a policy if there was such a thing. Atoz1 (talk) 23:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

False Eyelashes

This article keeps making references to "drawn on eye lashes" and "eye make-up" but in the film Malcolm McDOwell wore a real false eye lash from designer Mary Quant, with every other lash removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.63.200.102 (talk) 02:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting referenced entries on Zarjaz

Since Zarjaz is possibly one of the most important references to A Clockwork Orange since 1979 (noted as the first Droog band - CO based albums La Leggenda Del Block, Love Backed By Force etc.) it is unusual that reference to Zarjaz has been deleted here, especially since many of the notations, in the same section, remain, without reference. What is the reason for this? I would also say that it might be worth you reading Wikipedia:Verifiability - The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true. Harleancarpenter (talk) 16:26, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If such information has been published in a reliable source, please provide a reference. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 16:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you missed the point. details that were referenced with a reliable source were removed but you left a page full of unreferenced, unsourced notes Harleancarpenter (talk) 16:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced

I have removed all of the unreferenced assertions from the article. They should not be readded without adequate references. Items that are poorly or inadequately referenced should be removed soon. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 04:29, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support this action per WP:BURDEN. Erik (talk | contribs) 13:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conker's Bad Fur Day

The introduction of Conker's Bad Fur Day is no doubt a parody of that of the film version of A Clockwork Orange, however, I cannot find any sources to verify this claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gokulol2 (talk • contribs) (19:54, 15 July 2011)

This has been added and removed numerous times because no adequate ref. has ever been provided. ---RepublicanJacobite_TheFortyFive 21:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Annie Fanny Clockwork Orange.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Little Annie Fanny Clockwork Orange.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:23, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of cultural references to A Clockwork Orange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912084505/http://www.definitivejux.net/jukies/cage to http://www.definitivejux.net/jukies/cage

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking Down the Barrel of a Gun - The Beastie Boys

It says ultraviolence in the song and a few lines later says "I am like Clockwork Orange." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30C:FD47:C0E0:A1BE:2710:3B79:192F (talk) 10:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of cultural references to A Clockwork Orange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]