Jump to content

Talk:Linux for PlayStation 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Who has the kit? Sony only made a few of these linux kits and they sold fast. It was only verson 1.0, but I am not sure if Sony is in the process of making another Linux Kit for Playstation 2.

It wasn't lack of sales that caused the unavailablity of kits in NTSC U/C territory, they just sold the entire run of kits and didn't make more. It wasn't meant to be a wide release anyway. I have a kit and have been using it as a personal desktop since May of 2002. It was intended for hobbyist development, though there were people using them for scientific computing, like the cluster at the NSCA

I have the kit :-) Indeed, PS2 Linux was just junk. It obviously proved that a game console without games is nothing but a poor, useless computer; a mere 300MHz & 32MB RISC computer without hardware double-precision operation and 2D graphic acceleration is not enough for any purpose. Its only practical use is a small, quiet (but not extensible at all) home server. 219.113.144.250 22:01, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have the European kit. Window Maker can be seen ugly, but it's efficient and fast. With this kit, I read e-mails, surf on the web, type texts in Abiword, chat in ICQ/IRC and contribute in Wikipedia. I've no tested as a server, but as personal computer the kit fulfills the function. It's very limitated (no KDE, no Amerca's Army 4Linux) by sufficient to be an personal computer. With a modchip installed (DMS-3), you can partition the HD for Linux and HD Loader games. I have a memory card for the system and another for the games. And finishing, is fully possible use DVD drive in Linux, just using a patch. Resuming, it's very complicated and limited for casual users, but a great system for enthusiastics a awesome console game. --Brazil4Linux 13:53, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How do put this article in a subcategory of Linux_distributions called "Linux distributions for Game Consoles"? And is this a good title for this subcategory. Or how do I create a "List of Linux distributions for Game Consoles"? The articles about the distros that would go in this subcategory (or on this list) are already entered in wikipedia. Zerothis 05:08, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested rename

[edit]

PS2 Linux isn't the official title of the kit. The article should probably be renamed to "Linux (Playstation 2)" or "Linux Kit" or some other combination. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linux for PlayStation 2 it is then. Chris Cunningham 17:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HELP!!!

[edit]

According to the article, the memory card is used as RAM, but it is limited to 32MB. Can multiple cards be put in a multitap to quadruple the RAM to 128MB or two multitaps to octuple the RAM to 256MB? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.68.192.62 (talk) 03:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The memory card isn't used as ram, the PS2 has it's own internal 32 MB of ram which are used. The access speed on a memory card is VERY slow and using it for ram would be very impractical. A ps2 memory card also only has 8 MB of space, not 32. Mr toasty 03:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it should be added that the DVD-ROM drive is fully supported, and can be used for reading non-PlayStation media with the use of a mod chip. This particular restriction is one of hardware, not one enforced by Linux. Hence using a modchip alongside running Linux gives you complete control over the drive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.12.233.21 (talk) 11:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ps2 linux dvd.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Ps2 linux dvd.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 2 January 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Linux for PlayStation 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]