Jump to content

Talk:Leonard Boyarsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blizzard ?

[edit]

Where is it written that he works for Blizzard ? The given source does not tell about that... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ash Crow (talkcontribs) 12:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. This claim was added here [1] but I removed it as it was unsourced Nil Einne (talk) 11:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well it's pretty much official now, a google search brings up all kinds of stuff about it. This man is a genius, knowing that he's working on Diablo 3 I'm definitely going to buy it now. I hope he got to work on the dialogue and story! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.242.192.248 (talk) 04:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously?

[edit]

Is a Wikipedia entry really warranted for this individual? He is a video game designer, which is cool, but besides helping develop some video games has he made any significant contributions to the fields of computer science or computing in general that would put him in the interest of the public? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.103.5 (talk) 20:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If we were to go by those standards, then most video game designer entries would be removed for being hacks. This man, though it is inferred by the titles and companies he has worked for (so some familiarity is assumed by the article as well), has a good place in the history of writing and developing computer role-playing games. Even if that place is often unknown by most people, his importance in influencing both developers and the genre is inferred by his work, evidenced by the number of developers and genre references to the titles he has worked upon.

Your ignorance is forgiven. -Rosh :) 75.0.12.24 (talk) 02:42, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Leonard Boyarsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]