Talk:Legends of Zork
OK, it was nominated to be checked for neutrality 9 months ago, and this is the first comment on the talk page. Sad, truly sad. :)
I would agree that the tone of the Critical Reception section is very much NOT NPOV and should be rewritten or removed.
76.31.24.249 (talk) 17:55, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think the critical reception section violates NPOV. It simply states the opinions of two reviewers -- who wrote the only two reviews of this game around, last time I checked. I agree there's some question as to whether either of those review sites are reliable sources with editorial oversight, although Alec Meer is a video games journalist who has written for major publications and Kenneth Newquist apparently has written game reviews for scifiwire.com. Of course that does not establish the legitimacy of the reviews in question, which appeared on more blog-like websites. If you remove the section, I won't object. --Cornprone (talk) 07:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Legends of Zork. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20151107011912/http://forums.joltonline.com/showthread.php?615393-Game-Closure to http://forums.joltonline.com/showthread.php?615393-Game-Closure
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)