Talk:Legends of Zork

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

OK, it was nominated to be checked for neutrality 9 months ago, and this is the first comment on the talk page. Sad, truly sad. :)

I would agree that the tone of the Critical Reception section is very much NOT NPOV and should be rewritten or removed.

76.31.24.249 (talk) 17:55, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the critical reception section violates NPOV. It simply states the opinions of two reviewers -- who wrote the only two reviews of this game around, last time I checked. I agree there's some question as to whether either of those review sites are reliable sources with editorial oversight, although Alec Meer is a video games journalist who has written for major publications and Kenneth Newquist apparently has written game reviews for scifiwire.com. Of course that does not establish the legitimacy of the reviews in question, which appeared on more blog-like websites. If you remove the section, I won't object. --Cornprone (talk) 07:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Legends of Zork. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20151107011912/http://forums.joltonline.com/showthread.php?615393-Game-Closure to http://forums.joltonline.com/showthread.php?615393-Game-Closure

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]