Jump to content

Talk:Laos at the 2012 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLaos at the 2012 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 14, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 2, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that runners training to represent Laos at the 2012 Summer Olympics used barbell weights made from concrete, tires, and paint cans?
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laos at the 2012 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Laos at the 2012 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 15:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will take this review MWright96 (talk) 15:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Athletics

[edit]

Key

[edit]

Swimming

[edit]

References

[edit]

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Most I did, but I have some questions. Depending on when you reply, I might be away in the next hour or so as I have to go out. If that's the case, I'll reply as soon as I can. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MWright96: Pinging again in case you didn't see my comments above. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MrLinkinPark333:} Now promoting to GA class MWright96 (talk) 20:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MWright96: LOL i was editing the Athletics section to explain better why they didn't qualify. Thank you! Could you check it over since I'm looking to DYK it? --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MrLinkinPark333: I will go over the article tomorrow MWright96 (talk) 21:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk18:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by MrLinkinPark333 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]