Talk:Kudos (video game)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kudos (video game) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Kudos" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Merger proposal

I don't think Kudos 2 is notable enough for its own article, but I think the content could be easily included in this article. Any thoughts? MuZemike 21:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Im torn on this. The current state of the article suggests that theres little notability established. However I do see that there is some secondary sourcing (PC gamer UK has reviewed it for meta critic(See [1]). That and many other sites out there doing a basic search. So it can be improved i think and act as a stand alone with relevant sourcing. However someone would need to take the time to do this. If nothing is done for the page, certaintly i support a merge, however with a bit of love from someone famiilar with the game ( and some trimming of some issues) i think it could work as a standalone. Just some stray thoughts Ottawa4ever (talk) 10:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]