Talk:Kud Wafter

Kud Wafter has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 21, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
February 5, 2010	Good topic candidate	Promoted
September 16, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
December 23, 2011	Good topic removal candidate	Demoted
July 25, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
July 22, 2019	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
Current status: Good article

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games: Visual novels Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Kud Car auction

Placing the link to the archived auction here for safekeeping.--十八 04:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kud Wafter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: All of the statements and paragraphs are detailed and carefully written in a neutral fashion, consisting of no original research either. The characters subject are well presented, with a citation provided for each character. The concerns I have is the first reference, in terms of its reliability and accuracy. I clicked on all the links in that first reference and they are all internal links (in other words Wikipedia references). The "Key" link is inaccurate, as it links to the whole page and not a specific section. I'm also not sure if Twitter accounts count as reliable sources either, as shown in the "Development and release" section. Overall, it's almost there, although I would like a second reviewer to check whether the citation concerns I have mentioned are a further cause of concern. Minima c (talk) 07:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first cite is a cite for the video game itself with {{cite video game}}, since a specific third-party cite detailing the gameplay could not be found. The Twitter issue has come up before in WP:RS, where it's generally cited as a self-published source, which says that they can be used in certain cases. Considering this was a tweet from the president of the publisher, I thought it would be reliable enough for inclusion.--十八 08:06, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion. For citing the game in terms of the gameplay itself, I've seen it done on other GAs, and it seems to be fine; it's not actually citing Wikipedia. For the twitter note, I'd feel more comfortable if it was a verified account, though twitter is quite selective on marking those, so not having one doesn't mean it's not the president. The sentence says it's being announced via twitter, so having that as a ref, in this particular instance at least, makes sense. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I think it has fully met the GA standard --minhhuy*= (talk) 06:24, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look over this article for any issues, since it seems like the review's been abandoned. If I find nothing I'll pass it. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 19:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No further issues, so this passes as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]