Talk:Kimberly Jackson

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Removal of fan cruft

Removals as follows.

Non-notable composer of non-notable theme tune
PR stuff on the Fanbyte blog (x2)
Gushing praise from paid journalists not backed up by data.

This last point is the reason the character's actual popularity is brought up, from data given at an official Capcom source.

This will all need to be discussed before being put back in. 78.144.101.162 (talk) 20:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I believe you need to familiarize yourself with wikipedia's editorial policies. Case in point, Fanbyte is considered reliable per WP:VG/S. Secondly, you seem to be more interested in vandalizing this article. Third, the character's design is tied to her character design, just not expanded upon in the article itself at the moment. If you bothered to check the article, you would have noted that.

Now while it's customary to assume good faith on another editor's part, given your track record it is a bit harder to. So I will ask that you please slow down and actually do some research beforehand.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I truly have no idea what this is all about. None of these issues have merit. By what standard are you saying that the theme is non-notable? Because it's not the standard that we prioritize, which is whether a reliable secondary source gave it the time of day, which they did. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 21:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]