Talk:Kharosthi

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kharosthi article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Writing systems High‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Afghanistan

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.

South Asia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

A fact from Kharosthi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 March 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Kharosthi script was in use from the middle of the 3rd century BC until around the 3rd century AD?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2004/March.

Wikipedia

Page name contains undisplayable character

This is an example of a Wikipedia title that won't display properly on my computer. Even though I have a UNICODE font downloaded (which I imagine most English users won't) I still see "Khar**hi" where the * is an open rectangle denoting a missing character.

I can understand the importance of faithful preservation of foreign references in English text, although it leads to supposedly English-language articles that are unpronounceable by English speakers and often unrenderable on computers configured for English speakers.

If the English Wikipedia is going to run the gamut of foreign language characters, it would be nice to provide a simplified download and installation of the font(s) required to display those characters. User:24.147.11.214 13:08, 25 October 2005‎ (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree with the above unsigned suggestion. Can anyone please make any suggestions as to how we can get more diacritics added to the characters availabel for editing WP articles? John Hill (talk) 02:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The whole alphabet table does not display on my browser either. The entries should preferably be images, with the UNICODE characters besides them (or in a separate table), possibly linked to entries in some UNICODE database. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*

File:PhiloxenusCoin.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:PhiloxenusCoin.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:21, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Non-admin closure TB randley 20:01, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kharosthi → Kharosthi script –

Other script articles also have "script" in their titles e.g. Cyrillic script. Khestwol (talk) 15:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not completely opposed to this, but it warrants discussion. Cyrillic script is WP:PRECISE because there are other uses of "Cyrillic." That doesn't seem to be the case here. --BDD (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why? If there is no ambiguity, there is no need for "script". Cf. Devanāgarī, Kanji. — AjaxSmack 02:41, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There's far too much unnecessary in-title disambiguation within Wikipedia. Imc (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

How Kharoshti is not Brahmi derivative?

Kharoshti script is abugida just like the rest of brahmi derivatives. either brahmi is derivative of kharoshti or vice versa, there is no chance of two abugidas from indo aryan family having distinct origins. Kharoshti is brahmi derivative just like all the rest of indian scripts, biased scholars are just not accepting this very simple fact.Rameezraja001 (talk) 06:14, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to come up with citations to support your "very simple fact". Verifiability is how Wikipedia functions. DRMcCreedy (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppeteer disruption

A chronic sockpuppeteer, recently added POV content already present in the article. While reverting the edits that the sock had done in multiple articles, I did the same here per WP:DENY. They were restored without explanation, the sock edit inserted: ""Indo-Bactrian" script was an writing system originally developed in present-day northern Pakistan, sometime between the 4th and 3rd century BCE" into the lead. While the latter part is clearly WP:POVPUSH (already present in the article with a better flow as "used by various Indo-European peoples in present-day northern Pakistan and eastern Afghanistan. It was used in Central Asia as well. An abugida, it was introduced at least by the middle of the 3rd century BCE, possibly during the 4th century BCE, and remained in use until it died out in its homeland around the 3rd century CE."; the alternative names of "Indo-Bactrian", ~~"Indian Pali"~~ and "Arian Pali" as cited in the article are very uncommon (e.g. Kharosthi at the Encyclopædia Britannica) to merit inclusion in the lead.

While removing the obvious POVPUSH duplication, I have shifted the alt names to the hist section. Gotitbro (talk) 22:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I misread "Indian Pali" as an alt name for this script but the rest of the comment stands. No way is doing away with sockpuppet edits and trying to settle the content is disruptive (WP:STABLE and DENY have already been cited). You can try and reach a consensus here, WP:EDITWARRING is not going to get anywhere. This specific holding on to the edits of a sock should not be a priority. @Khestwol, Kashmiri, पाटलिपुत्र, and Uanfala: inviting past contributors for comments. Gotitbro (talk) 07:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]