Talk:Kenshin Dragon Quest

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Subtitle

What does the subtitle mean?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.155.52 (talk) 19:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to RPgamer, it is Swordmaster Dragon Quest: Resurrection of the Legendary Sword. I added and cited that in the article and added some Story information I could find on the DQ Shrine. Sgetz (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy

In reviewing the information posted here about the two games that use the hardware from this game, I do not see anything sourced to confirm this. Does anyone know this to be true, and have anything to back it up. It might need to be removed if we cannot cite it. Thoughts? Sgetz (talk) 22:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I answered my own question. Can someone check my sources over and see if that is good enough to justify those to being mentioned here? Sgetz (talk) 22:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be in order. Evaunit♥666♥ 02:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

Thoughts on this article being removed from a Stub status? I think I have added and cited as much about the game as is possible, since there is not a whole lot out there about it. Thoughts? Sgetz (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

Good job. I can tell that this definitely isn't a stub anymore. I've got some suggestions for improvement, however:

You need to create a development/reception section. These sections explain how the game was developed, and how it was received by critics and fans alike, as well as sales data. Use {{VG Reviews}} in the Reception section.
When you got the above written, expand the lead to include information like that.
Remember to add cites!

Doing so should get you C-Class. --haha169 (talk) 17:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]