Talk:Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Reply: You didn't tag this page, did you?

uhm the last section on modding is EXTREMELY unproffesional and should be cleaned up.

Almost as unprofessional as your grammar, spelling and Wikipedia editing. No, the modding will not be cleaned up, as it is an older game, and makes the game interesting once again.--WhereAmI 04:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JPOG.jpg

Image:JPOG.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've only played the PC version so can't speak for the console versions, but it looks like there are a lot of dinosaurs on the list that were never featured in the game.

Userbox

This user is part of the Operation Genesis project.

{{user:Cuddly Panda/Userboxes/JPOG}} - add to your page. ----- [[User:Cuddly Panda|Cuddly Panda [[User talk:Cuddly Panda|Blab]] ([[User talk:Cuddly Panda/Non Wikipedia talk|Non-wiki]]) | [[Special:Contributions/Cuddly Panda|Contribs]] |]] 13:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pteradons

I really think it's stupid that the game Jurassic Park Operation Genesis, that their are no Pteradons. Like in Jurassic Park III, the huge bird cage was awsome, so why can't you build one in the game? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.125.124.220 (talk) 21:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it would be really cool, it would probably cost a lot, but still it would be cool. They didm't do it because I think that they didn't have enough time.--Dinonerd4488 (talk) 23:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would probally be hard to program it, like how it could be attacked or how it would attack. And what would happen if it got out its enclosure? I will take the opportunity to say the picture of the case is way different ot mine, mine has a coloured back ground and the spino is larger but the t-rex smaller.Spinodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did anyone else experience the bug described in the "Bugs" section? SHSB09 (talk) 22:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys i truly appreciate the making of this page. I remember when it was up then deleted, i was really hoping someone would come back and remake it. Thanks again. Good work.--- JPRaptor11 —Preceding unsigned comment added by JPRaptor11 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note, for anybody who still keeps tabs on this page

IP's 98.195.226.38 and 2601:e:1680:8c4:618e:4895:ebf7:7d3b both seem hellbent on reverting the article to a vandalized and (in my opinion, at least) overall worse-structured version. You can see the differences between my edit and the one the IPs are arguing for here. Dromaeosaurus is best dinosaur 22:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raptormimus456 (talk • contribs)

Reply: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:E:1680:8C4:618E:4895:EBF7:7D3B (talk) 01:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC) That's exactly right, it's your opinion. The page is not vandalized and contributes a fair amount of knowledge to the game as a whole, even if it's not a vanilla feature.[reply]

Reference for a possible 'Development' section

Here is a good reliable reference for a possible 'development' section if an editor wants to tackle it one day in the future. DrNegative (talk) 01:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added link to template above. DrNegative (talk) 17:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dansjp3page.com/index2.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://dansjp3page.com/oldnews49.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamerspulse.com/interviews/5063/index.shtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dansjp3page.com/oldnews52.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "Fan Modification" section request for article?

I think the section, "Fan Modification", should be removed from this article of Wikipedia for multiple reasons.

1. It contains possible original research. Even if it may be true, the content should be from a reliable official source.

2. It contains content from unreliable sources, such as user/fan-labored forums.

3. The overal content of the section is what I believe is unnecessary for a Wikipedia article.

Gabeluna27 (talk) 08:40, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source

https://web.archive.org/web/20031013074437/http://www.multiplayer.it/b2b/articoli.php3?id=7786