Talk:JezzBall

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Emote (1 participant)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (3 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reversion

Because I failed to properly list rationales for the numerous fair use images included in this article, the photos were subsequently deleted, and when that was done, contributors edited out almost the entire article, as it dealt too heavily in the gaming strategy, I suppose, to allow it to remain without the screenshot images.

Please feel free to edit this article, and I apologize to those whose edits since the removal of these images and related text are now gone, but the article is a much stronger one now, providing a more comprehensive discussion about what the game is and how to play it. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 20:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are points where your revision of the article is superior to what you overwrote, but there are others where it seems not to maintain a neutral POV. Also, the large tactics section reads more like a strategy guide than encyclopedic content. Article's still in need of some cleanup. MrZaius^talk 20:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had nothing to do with the "Clones" section, and for all I care, it can be entirely redone to suit Wiki standards as you or anyone else perceives them. As far as the strategy guide comment...i'll see what i can do to touch it up. Thanx. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 19:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

An interested party should probably go through and remove the unsourceable material. The tactics section is especially bad... Wickethewok 17:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The original author of said content rather vociferously defended it when it was removed before, but perhaps it's time to broach the subject again. Would it do any harm to move the strategy-guide like content to Wikibooks, resolving the Wikipedia:Original research concerns? MrZaius^talk 18:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you guys wanted a response, you should have dropped me a line -- I don't tag pages and I just happened by again and saw this. Nostalgically, I think the current content is fantastic...but as far as OR concerns go, perhaps none of it belongs. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 03:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job!

Good job to the recent editors in removing my previous violations of OR and reformatting! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Similarity to Windows Vista's InkBall?

The article in question: InkBall.

Is this noteworthy? --rjcuk (talk) 23:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]