Jump to content

Talk:Italian cruiser Libia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleItalian cruiser Libia has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starItalian cruiser Libia is part of the Protected cruisers of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 27, 2014Good article nomineeListed
February 13, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Note(s) for later

[edit]

Friedman has a third page that mentions Libia not viewable on gbooks. Parsecboy (talk) 15:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Libia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 01:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Comments as follows:

  • Infobox: Inconsistency between mm/cm in the armament section
    • Fixed
  • Service history: needs a clear statement that was intended for Ottoman Navy, as per lead.
    • Added, good catch.
  • wikilink Ottoman Empire and Austro-Hungarian
    • Added links
  • Doesn't explictly state the RM seized the ship as per lead
    • It's in the service history section where it discusses the ship's construction.
  • Missing word I think? "Instead, Revel decided to implement blockade"; should that be "implement a blockade"?
    • Fixed.

Checked duplicate and links; there are none. No images to review.

In summary, minor issues only; I'll check on progress in a few days. Zawed (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article, Zawed. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, passing as GA. Zawed (talk) 07:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]