Talk:Italian cruiser Libia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 01:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Comments as follows:

Infobox: Inconsistency between mm/cm in the armament section
- Fixed
Service history: needs a clear statement that was intended for Ottoman Navy, as per lead.
- Added, good catch.
wikilink Ottoman Empire and Austro-Hungarian
- Added links
Doesn't explictly state the RM seized the ship as per lead
- It's in the service history section where it discusses the ship's construction.
Missing word I think? "Instead, Revel decided to implement blockade"; should that be "implement a blockade"?
- Fixed.

Checked duplicate and links; there are none. No images to review.

In summary, minor issues only; I'll check on progress in a few days. Zawed (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article, Zawed. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]