Jump to content

Talk:Imran Khan government

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scope

[edit]

@SheriffIsInTown: I just wanted to know if the scope of Prime Ministership of Imran Khan is similar to this article? If its the same, you might wanna merge that article into this one because (a) that article was created a day after this one (b) this article follows the existing naming convention for example, Third Sharif ministry & Abbasi ministry. Son of Kolachi (talk) 08:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Son of Kolachi: The scope for both should be different, see Modi ministry and Premiership of Narendra Modi, two different articles! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 11:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clarify on the above, this article is on Khan's cabinet and team. Not his term in office. Mar4d (talk) 10:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added NPOV

[edit]

The current article is biased and reads as if it has been taken from Khan's political opponents. There is especially no need to recount in loving detail (as the article does) every job with Musharraf every cabinet member ever had. Just a note that this is a criticism will suffice.

Plus nothing about who the cabinet members are, the ethnic and gender composition, who is new to elected office, who is in federal office for the first time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparten (talkcontribs) 15:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree to your blanket removal the way you did it. The content is supported by the sources. It is in the sources that most of his chosen cabinet members served under Musharraf. Details about each minister are necessary so we do not leave the reader guessing and thinking that the claim might be a fluke. I agree that it does not have anything regarding gender and ethnic composition of the cabinet. Why don't you take it upon yourself to expand the article on that front instead of removing the content which does not fit well with your POV. There is no need for POV tag, nobody is stopping you from giving the other side of the picture if there is one, I am only stopping you from removing what is already there! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Sparten: Instead of tagging the pages, you may want to consider writing the other side of the picture. I don't find anything which implies this article biased in any way. --Saqib (talk) 16:13, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is biased as it lists in detail what each member did and implies that it’s a continuation of Musharraf. The first paragraph which deals with this is fine. The lengthy description is not.

Sorry this reeks of bias, and you are also not supposed to remove NPOV without discussion and consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparten (talkcontribs) 16:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sparten: Several reputable news outlets ran news stories to highlight the fact that half of Khan’s cabinet members served under Musharraf.[1][2][3][4]
I am not removing that content Sparten, that explains in detail about each minister's role under Musharraf, that is necessary information for the reader, it's also not that article cannot take more information. If you have content which is contrary to what is in the article then please add otherwise you are just attempting to censor under the blanket of WP:NPOV and instead being biased yourself, that will not be allowed. You can take the matter to NPOV notice board if you still disagree but we are not going to keep the tag forever just because you disagree. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 19:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "By the military, of the military! Half of Imran Khan's cabinet has served under Musharraf". The Financial Express. 20 August 2018. Retrieved 28 August 2018. {{cite news}}: no-break space character in |title= at position 80 (help)
  2. ^ "Majority of PTI ministers, advisers served under Musharraf". The News. Retrieved 28 August 2018.
  3. ^ "12 of Imran's 21 cabinet members held key posts during Musharraf regime - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 28 August 2018.
  4. ^ "Imran Khan picks Cabinet ministers: Former Pervez Musharraf loyalists holding key posts may not be bad news for Pakistan - Firstpost". www.firstpost.com. Retrieved 28 August 2018.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images

[edit]

I want to add images on Wikipedia page Ahsan kb (talk) 21:45, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shakir

[edit]

Vvxc Vxx 37.111.134.167 (talk) 06:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Imran Khan government

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Imran Khan government's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT 01:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Over-citation in lead

[edit]

The first paragraph has 9 references, which sure looks like WP:OVERCITE to me. It looks like the number of ministers has changed, but surely some reputable source somewhere has an up-to-date list (or at least a timeline of the changes) that can be used. Snowman304|talk 13:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]