Talk:Hydlide
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Music
[edit]The article states that "Hydlide is also infamously known for its repetitive music, which bears similarity to John Williams' Indiana Jones theme. For the Famicom (NES) version this is understandable, since the only two RPG/Adventure games made for the Famicom without bankswitched memory were it and Enix's adventure game PORTOPIA Renzoku Satsujin Jiken which has no music." This seems like a non-sequitur; how does the information in the second sentence relate to the first? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree he didn't explain it well, but it is related. Without bankswitching, memory is very limited, leaving little room for music, or no room at all in the case of the other game mentioned. Such little room meant one simple tune over and over. The simple tune they used sounds like the Indy theme.76.226.99.243 (talk) 04:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
pc remake Hydlide: Download Edition
[edit]is the pc remake will be considered? just a quick question, since i found no info on the net, about the pc remake of 2000. The only link i found was; that the remake was translated into English by Derrick Sobodash of CinnamonPirate —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.143.243.66 (talk) 06:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Developer
[edit]Are all the Hydlide games made by the same developer? SharkD (talk) 20:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Genre confusion
[edit]Hello. I have a bit of an issue with the following sentence in the main article:
"The game took several years to release in America, by which time The Legend of Zelda had a more refined, advanced take on the action-RPG formula"
This comparison makes little sense in the way it's written because these games are from different genres. Hydlide is very much an Action-RPG hybrid, but the Legend of Zelda is Action-Adventure... not a hint of RPG in it so, clearly, the comparison is flawed.
One might argue that by the time Hydlide was released outside of Japan, many other NES games were superior (regardless of genre), but singling out the Legend of Zelda seems out of place.
Should this be completely removed from the article (since it seems to be original research, anyway), or should it be rewritten in a more accurate way? Opinions, please.
Raven-14 (talk) 11:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- It's been about nine months since I posted the above message and no one provided any further input on this. Given that the original source given is questionable (not notable, personal gaming site), I decided to delete that small piece.
- If you believe there's a better a way to rephrase it (without, incorrectly, calling the The Legend of Zelda a RPG, for instance) and you can find a more reliable source, by all means, add it. I looked but, frankly, found nothing.
- Raven-14 (talk) 07:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hydlide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/60hNUNOGQ?url=http://www.hardcoregaming101.net/dragonslayer/dragonslayer.htm to http://www.hardcoregaming101.net/dragonslayer/dragonslayer.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)