Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Olaf (2003)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Olaf (2003) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHurricane Olaf (2003) is part of the 2003 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 22, 2010Good article nomineeListed
June 18, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Olaf (2003)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 21:36, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Grammatical mistakes are present and clarification needs to be make in some areas such as "but during real time believed to had been a hurricane for much longer." Also minor grammatical mistakes such as "Over the next two weeks the it moved" and also, "This is equivalent winds". Also when rounding the figures the number at the end either should be a 5 or a 0 eg. (63 mph is rounded to 65 mph and 72mph is rounded to 70 mph).
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. *Issues fixed*
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Covers all necessary aspects of a tropical cyclone article. Focused on the topic, doesn't stray.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Not biased.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No edit wars
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Images are captioned and are tagged. Has sufficient images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Issues resolved passing. Congratulations.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Olaf (2003). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hurricane_Olaf_(2003)&oldid=1211228899"