Talk:Hurricane Olaf (2003)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 21:36, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Grammatical mistakes are present and clarification needs to be make in some areas such as "but during real time believed to had been a hurricane for much longer." Also minor grammatical mistakes such as "Over the next two weeks the it moved" and also, "This is equivalent winds". Also when rounding the figures the number at the end either should be a 5 or a 0 eg. (63 mph is rounded to 65 mph and 72mph is rounded to 70 mph).
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable. *Issues fixed*
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Covers all necessary aspects of a tropical cyclone article. Focused on the topic, doesn't stray.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Not biased.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images are captioned and are tagged. Has sufficient images.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Issues resolved passing. Congratulations.
- Pass/Fail: