Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Henriette (1995)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Henriette (1995) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starHurricane Henriette (1995) is part of the 1995 Pacific hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 16, 2009Good article nomineeListed
April 22, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Todo

[edit]

Any more met. history from the discussions? I think it could be at least three paragraphs. Also, there are some reference problems. Ref #13 (which I cannot open) deals with two different intensities at two different times in its history. It doesn't mention its weakening to TS status. Why did it move the way it did? If these issues aren't addressed, I will be doing a complete review to see if it passes all of the GA criteria. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll address this issues within the next few days, but note that it already passed GA. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I personally think the GA review was not properly done, hence why I plan to do a re-assessment. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you disagree, go for it. Ref 13 worked when I reviewed it. Just because I didn't put the template in there doesn't mean I didn't properly review it. Of course, the TC project does have different standards for itself which may differ from the general wikipedia criteria, and no one knows them better than you. Thegreatdr (talk) 13:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll just wait, say, a week, before doing any re-assessing. DR, you gave a decent review, but I expected more from Julian, given that he basically copied the content from the main article and split it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Splitting content off the season summary is definitely a good way to start an article. Normally you need to put more detail into a storm-related article for it to pass GA, and I did get him to add some more to it, mainly from a rainfall perspective. Thegreatdr (talk) 17:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to delist it. WPTC's standards are apparently far too high for me. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I warned you about the same problems when you GA nommed Hurricane Alma (1996). I don't think having a complete meteorological history is setting the standards far too high. Will you do any work to it? ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Years have gone by, and should this article be re-assesed? YE Pacific Hurricane 21:06, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Henriette (1995). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Henriette (1995). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hurricane_Henriette_(1995)&oldid=1211225729"