Talk:Hurricane Flossy (1956)

Hurricane Flossy (1956) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hurricane Flossy (1956) is part of the 1956 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 28, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
February 6, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 6, 2007.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Hurricane Flossy was the first tropical cyclone to significantly impact oil refining in the Gulf of Mexico?

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Todo

More storm history. →Cyclone1→ 00:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the article is not progressing fast enough for your liking, you can help out. Thegreatdr 03:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flossy or Flossie

Which one is it? The article uses both. 207.203.80.14 14:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's Flossy. Man, why does this article have both!? RaNdOm26 16:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because when a request was put in for this article, it was spelled with an ie at the end (tropical cyclone project mistake). I found out a little later it ended with a y...I should have checked to make sure as I began the article. Thought I'd changed it all over to the y form. If I missed some occurrences, I'm glad you made the change. Thegreatdr 02:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths

Why is there no mention of the 16 fatalities in the Impact section? And the main article says 15 fatalities, which is it? -- §Hurricane E RIC § archive 15:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The lead could be expanded with a little more information.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This is very close to GA, but the only problem is the lead. It should be expanded to include the date it formed, the date it became a storm, depression, its peak strength, and weakening. Also, put a few tidbits of damage in. When that is fixed, it will pass. Until then, I've put the article on-hold. Thank you for your work in improving the article thus far, and good luck in improving it to GA status. Juliancolton ^{The storm still blows...} 02:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I think. I've also added a couple links to a new See Also section, which are relevant. Thegreatdr (talk) 06:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The lead could be expanded with a little more information.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Ok, now that the lead was expanded with more information, the article meets all criteria. Thus, it passes GA. Thank you for your hard work in improving this article to GA status. Juliancolton ^{The storm still blows...} 13:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Request opened by block-evader. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Flossy (1956) → Hurricane Flossy – Only one Atlantic hurricane named Flossy. 219.79.250.146 (talk) 01:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. SkyWarrior 02:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support as the target article is a redirect to this article. Laurdecl ^talk 06:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm thinking Hurricane Flossy should probably be retargeted to Tropical Storm Flossie, which lists this storm. This would be similar to how we've handled other alternative spellings like Hurricane Charley (disambiguation). – Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Flossy (1956). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Flossy (1956). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 February 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:47, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Flossy (1956) → Hurricane Flossy – Only one Atlantic hurricane named Flossy. B dash (talk) 02:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose cannot see the advantage of removing the year for events. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unnecessary disambiguation. Wrongly implying there is another hurricane with this name, as the current title does, is NOT helpful to anyone. --В²C ☎ 02:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Hurricane Flossy should redirect to Tropical Storm Flossie, where there are multiple similar names that were used for tropical cyclones.Nova Crystallis (Talk) 01:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.