Talk:Hogan's Alley (video game)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Virtual Console comment wrong, unfounded, and a mere rumor

This article states that the gmae is confirmed for the Virtual Console. Not only is this a wild guess and unsubstantiated, but there's also no way this could be for the VC anyway, as one would need the light gun, and there is no Wiimote functionality for either emulated NES games or any virtual console, to date. It also is impossible without completly reworking the game. In which case it would be for WiiWare, and that has also never been mentioned, confirmed, or in any way, officially announced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.208.4.228 (talk) 06:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cameos should be merged

I think Hogan's Alley cameos should be merged into this article, mainly because

frankly, the article just isn't big enough to be split into subarticles,
Furthermore, the cameo article is not that good, it lacks an introduction and on its own merits it would be deleted quite soon,
The cameo list is never going to be extensive enough. If megapopular hero Samus Aran can deal with a list of cameos in the article, why not a little bit less popular game?

Now, does anyone have any good reasons why the article shouldn't be merged? --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 22:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be merged. Go for it. Then the cameos article should be deleted--no need to even make it into a redirect. — Frecklefoot | Talk 02:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression article deletion is never done in case of merges, as that'd cause complications with the GFDL requirements. Also, redirects are cheap. =) I'll go ahead with the merge - can't imagine why anyone would object to it. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:48, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wii Zapper shell

"It is confirmed for Virtual Console. It will most likely take advantage of the Wii Zapper shell (See Wii Remote)."

I don't think the Zapper shell has been confirmed as anything other than a prototype right now. I'm removing the second sentence. NighTrekr 20:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not an Arcade Game

Well, it was, but only eventually. It was released for the Famicom in June of 1984 while arcade version was released in March the next year. The article should be changed to reflect that. This goes for all Vs titles by the way. I know the Pinball page suffers from the same problem and it should be dealt with everywhere. (Djungelurban (talk) 02:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hogan's Alley (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]