Talk:Hildegard von Krone
 | Hildegard von Krone was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hildegard von Krone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100226192154/http://blogs.ign.com/NB_SoulCalibur/2008/07/03/94745 to http://blogs.ign.com/NB_SoulCalibur/2008/07/03/94745/
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.next-gen.biz/reviews/review-soul-calibur-iv - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090917030808/http://www.shacknews.com/featuredarticle.x?id=834 to http://www.shacknews.com/featuredarticle.x?id=834
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]I was asked not to send this straight to AFD, so I've tagged it instead. This is in response to the recent redirect/merge (which was proper in my eyes) and subsequent restoration. Review of the sources:
1. Facebook, yeah right out. 2. BtVA, doesn't do anything for GNG 3. Primary source. 4. Primary source. 5. Bare announcement coverage. 6. Primary Source. 7. Primary source. 8. offline can't check 9. Primary source interview but little actual commentary. 10. Primary Source. 11. Doesn't even mention Hilde. 12. Primary Source. 13. Announcement. 14. Primary Source. 15. Primary source. 16. Broken. 17. Primary Source. 18. Preview/announcement. 19. Trivial. 20. Primary. 21. Listicle with a bare minimum of plot regurgitation 22. Non-independent, game review. 23. Listicle. 24. Non-independent, game review. 25. Really? "Babe of the Week"? Slide show with a few short sentences and no actual coverage. 26. Trash source. Should be replaced by the full 1up article it's trying to link, but I can't bother to dig up the archive right now.
Out of 26 sources, 13 are clearly primary. Most of the next quarter are basic announcements/previews of the game. The rest are trivial mentions.
There is not a single in-depth source in use at this time, Special:Diff/1151435082. -- ferret (talk) 01:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)