Talk:Hildegard von Krone/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pres N 17:35, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work as always, you're good at these character articles. My concerns:

Ref 16 (kotaku) doesn't seem to have any content. (The post itself is missing) Also, I'm not sure if Kotaku is really an RS.

Ref 7 (Otadesho) also doesn't seem to be an RS. Both of these are for the same statement; maybe just source it to the manga itself?

The rest of it looks good; I fixed a minor grammar problem. --Pres N 17:35, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nixed Otadesho, since it's just a repeat of the Kotaku content anyway and was a backup source. As for Kotaku, it should be fine since they're considered author-dependent for reliability, and Ashcraft's considered reliable from discussions on WT:VG/S.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, cool. Passed. --Pres N 05:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]