Talk:Hamlet (video game)
Untitled comment
[edit]Sorry, wrong tagging. Needs renamed. --ANowlin: talk 15:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Removed Features
[edit]The claim was presented on this article that this was the first indie game based on Hamlet, but that does not appear to be true as per http://gamecareerguide.com/features/559/results_from_game_design_.php Too, the lack of an inventory is not a feature. Suitecake (talk) 02:37, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
This page reads like a huge advert
[edit]I wanted to find out about this game since a friend mentioned playing it and proclaiming it was awful, which lead me here. I can't really find much about it on the internet either except reviews by Eurogamer (in a roundup, so not even it's own review), tiny unexceptional review sites and sites that basically review every ios game ever. The page seems to mostly be edited by Special:Contributions/Spawnspawn Spawnspawn, who only edits on this page.
The above wouldn't be a big issue except that it reads like a huge advert, with the opener proclaiming it award winning, and featuring no sources except those of its review scores. It also only mentions the good reviews in its mainline text. Is the game even notable? Gunrun (talk) 23:17, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hamlet (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100627001705/http://www.gameshark.com/reviews/3558/Hamlet-Review.htm to http://www.gameshark.com/reviews/3558/Hamlet-Review.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121230233847/https://play.google.com/store/apps/collection/promotion_3000069_best_games to https://play.google.com/store/apps/collection/promotion_3000069_best_games
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/67DQNikpI?url=http://bestappever.com/awards/2011/winner/adgm to http://bestappever.com/awards/2011/winner/adgm
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/67DQQSA4b?url=http://www.gogaminggiant.com/2011/01/03/best-downloadable-games-of-2010/ to http://www.gogaminggiant.com/2011/01/03/best-downloadable-games-of-2010/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-noteworthy Awards
[edit]@Spawnspawn: We seem to have a disagreement about the notability of the awards being listed under the Reception section of the article. These award outlets are not listed as reliable sources in Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources. Additionally, a simple list of awards is not representative of the total reception that the game has received. This misleading reception is probably worse than no reception section at all. What are your thoughts? Suitecake (talk) 18:52, 3 September 2019 (UTC)