Jump to content

Talk:Guatemala/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Sources?

The Guatemala page is seriously lacking in citations. This page needs sources identified to ensure its accuracy.

I understand the requirement. However, for Guatemala, as for a lot of latin american countries, there is not much information online, besides very general info like population, area, etc. This is a by-product of the lack of technology and investment by the governments and institutions in putting more information online. Of course, this also applies to a big part of latin american and african countries (basically, third-world). In the future, this will probably be better, but for now, the Wikipedia is probably one of the most authorative websites on the subject. mjuarez 07:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
You may naturally also site books. There are definitely enough books in print to source and in many of the cases citing something like the historical section of a travel guide book would likely be enough. Scott.wheeler 23:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: mjuarez--that's unfortunate, but it means that the info on such countries would have to be limited. A lack of sources doesn't justify unsourced info. MrVibrating (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

There are thousands and thousands of books on Guatemala, and all this could be sourced there, not just travel books. -notenderwiggin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.236.169 (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

There are definitely no lack of information on Guatemala neither online or in books. There have been written dozens of books alone on the subject of the post-1945 period and the US-sponsored coup, this being a model example that was to shape US foreign policy until today and symptomatic for Latin America. There is certainly plenty of sources for knowledge on Guatemala. --Thomaselstedr (talk) 05:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Quiché

I don't know, but the link from Quiche goes to quiche which has nothing to do with the province of Quiche meant in the text!

Thanks for pointing that out. Sometimes an accent mark makes a LOT of difference! Changed to "Quiché". Cheers, -- Infrogmation 13:23, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Anon comment with homework due

I've never used this site, but I'm wondering why this page is offered in a trillion languages EXCEPT the most obvious one? Why is there no Spanish translation? It would really help for my project due tomorrow :)

The link to the Español version works fine. -- Infrogmation 15:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

54 coup

No mention of the '54 demolition of its democracy? Communism isn't democratic.--70.189.32.215 02:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

You didn't bother to look at History of Guatemala, eh?
Funny, when I see a "History" on the main page, I expect to find the history there ... in particular that if, say, I search for "54" and miss it, that there's nothing about it. Why not have the history of Guatemala all on one freaking page?
"Guatemala" is meant to be an overview of the country, not an in-depth analysis of all aspects. Individual pages like History of Guatemala and Geography of Guatemala go into greater depth on their respective topics. If there are individual events or periods in Guatemalan history that warrant even more detail, they will have their own articles.
If we tried to include everything about Guatemala in the "Guatemala" article, it would be far too long and detailed to be useful. (For an example of a page where too much historical detail is presented on the country page, see Germany.) It's a tough call to decide which facts, dates, and events should be included in the summary. If you think that 1954 is important enough to be mentioned in the historical summary, you can always add a short sentence about it. —Bkell 09:30, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I agree with Bkell, --SqueakBox 17:03, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

The 1945 coup in Guatemala can hardly, even jokingly be said to be any matter of detail. It shaped not only the history to come for Guatemala, but shaped the foreign policy the United States was to apply later throughout all but the whole of Latin America, then expand to the South East Asia and then the Middle East, the effects of which we have seen all to well in these past 8 years in particular. The 1954 coup of Guatemala rightly has its own site, but must under no circumstances take a minor place in the main Guatemala article. It's the first historical fact any visitor learns when coming to Guatemala. --Thomaselstedr (talk) 05:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Mormon fantasyland in Guatemala??

Why is it of any interest to anyone that some crank reliigion locates one of its fantasylands in Guatemala? I am referring to the paragraph under "Geography" that mentions the land of Lehi-Nephi or whatever. This has absolutely nothing to do with Guatemala.

Removed text moved below. Possibly it could go in as a point in some future detailed article about tourism in Guatemala.

"In Mormon culture, Guatemala is the most popular traditional location of the Book of Mormon land of Lehi-Nephi, though this is not official doctrine of the LDS Church. The popular LDS tourism service, Israel Revealed, has package tours that include various spots in Guatemala."

It is not for you to judge whether a religion is a "crank religion", or whether its sacred lands are "fantasylands". This is a real religious and cultural tradition and it pertains to Guatemala's geography. If geography is the wrong section, then move it to another. Either way, it must remain. When you remove content citing "crank" and "fantasyland", then I call that vandalism, and anyone else would agree. - Gilgamesh 03:43, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

As a non-Christian and student of Mayan art and society the Mormon connection is very important and very interesting.

JPZuniga I agree that the Mormon reference does not make any sense. This is not Guatemala Culture, it is Mormon Culture. I have visit Guatemala, and they are more into catholic culture, for example, tha Easter Celebration is a huge deal there, with big processions and arts on the streets. Besides the Curch still strong there and the catholics have a Guatemalan Saint, the Brother Peter, who was the first saint in Central America. The Mormo reference is just an idea from some people who believe in that, it should go to an article about Mormon Culture, or Mormon American Judaism, or something like it.

mcg I also agree that this Morman reference has no place being here. It has nothing to do with Guatemalan Culture. The Israel Revealed reference smacks of an advertisement as well.

Map

See Talk:Geography of Guatemala

Map of Guatemala
Map of Guatemala showing departments


Map

What do people think? would like to see a different map at Geography of Guatemala from the one we have here, --SqueakBox 23:04, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC) Haha..."crank religion." Having spent some time in Guatemala and in Belize, I can say first hand that understanding the influence of the Mennonites and the Mormons is quite significant in understanding the culture of the country.

I lived in Guatemala for 8 1/2 years and during that time, being in and around the culture and studying about it, I have not heard of much influence from the Mormon Church. Statistically, Catholisism and Christianity traditional mayan religious God's, (The God of the Son, The God of Corn), are most prominent religiously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxxemous (talk • contribs) 07:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Do you currently live in Guatemala? Evangelical churches, including the mormons, are having a big impact, even in very traditional Mayan areas. -notenderwiggin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.236.169 (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandal info

The following is, I think, of interest, so I post it here, --SqueakBox 17:01, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

I deleted the text below. None of what you posted was in any way related to the vandalization. It was a political article without any relevance to this discussion.

End of Political violence in Guatemala

Political Violence is alive and well in Guatemala. See for example the Amnesty International report from November 6 2003. It is true that the peak of violence was reached in 1983 but it wasn't until Bill Clinton cut off financial support to the Guatemalan Government in 1994 that the Governmant began to make real efforts to reduce violence against opposition political activists. Having just spent 2 months there this spring I would say that a resumption of hostilities is not imminent but a great deal of anger and suffering lingers and the peace is not stable or certain.

What happened with the info that immediately after USA under Clinton withdrew, Israelis supported extensively the military junta? Some AIPAC/Mossad/B'nai Brith/extremists lobbygrouops erased this? And what was behind this support & might there have been a deal with interests of the USA, that Israel took over? --86.80.117.147 (talk) 11:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Dept or dept

I propose to change the names from say Totonicapán Department to Totonicapán department, SqueakBox 15:55, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

please see Talk:Departments of Guatemala Tobias Conradi (Talk) 16:17, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Yes, Squeakbox; I invite you to make a statement there in favor of why we should use department instead of Department. Having more real-world examples will only help. --Golbez 18:48, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
Capitalization should only be used for proper names. Totonicapán, the name of a place, falls under this category. Department, which is just a generic identifier (like table or airplane) should not be capitalized. mjuarez 07:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Demographics

Someone keeps changin demographics for Guatemala. The percentage is that Mestizos and whites make up 59% of Guatemala. In reality whites represent less than 2% of Guatemalans. This is incorrect. Someone please do your homework before posting information. This is a encyclopedia anyone can edit, but make sure your information is accurate.

Yes, it vexes me greatly. This inaccuracy exists throughout the demographics portion of articles pertaining to Central and South American countries. Hispanicized or not, it can be approximated, that the whole of Guatemala is Amerindian. This racism must cease. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.186.131 (talk) 07:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

And who authors this? Where does this North American pale-face acquire his/her information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.186.131 (talk) 07:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

The source for this information is the CIA World Factbook. I'm not sure how the World Factbook gathers its information, but I imagine it has to be from the Guatemalan government itself. The statistic is 59.4% Mestizo and European combined. The source does not split this out; it may only be a very small part that is predominantly European. This is not saying that the majority of Guatemalans are white; it's just saying they have heritage from both Amerindians and Europeans. If someone can find a source that gives a more specific breakdown, then we can look at that. It may be that the census done in Guatemala combines both groups, but I have no idea. It's the source that's used, not anyone's opinion. Someone can have dark skin and still have part European heritage. Kman543210 (talk) 08:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Religion

The leader of Guatemnalan Catholic Church has changed to "Mons. Álvaro Leonel Ramazzini Imeri" since January 2006.

User: Cuete Date: 23/02/2006

The following paragraph was removed for lacking propper references: "In connection with the country's dominant Roman Catholic faith, the patron Saints of Guatemala are Our Lady of the Rosary and St. James the Greater."

Those aren't patron Saints of Guatemala.

Cuete 08:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Guatemala Portal

Please help expanding the Portal.

Thanks

--alfiboy 19:53, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

War Heroes

I consider that the following paragraph in the History section should be removed:

"The Guatemalan army had many heros. Some stand ouut include Ramon Martinez and Jose Gracia Padilla of Guatemala City. Another Decorated war hero is Juan Garcia Fabian. With a backround in Huehuetenango he helped the Guatemalan Army defeat the marxist guerillas. He is a true hero in the eyes of all Guatemalans. The army could not defeat the URNG that had access to more sophisticated weapons."

It does not have any reliable source.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cuete (talk • contribs) 05:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Catholic Leader

The following paragraph in the Religion section:

"The current Roman-Catholic leader of Guatemala, Rodolfo Cardinal Quezada Toruño, is the archbishop of Guatemala City and a cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church."

Should change to: "The current Roman-Catholic leader of Guatemala is Mons. Álvaro Leonel Ramazzini Imeri"

Mons. Álvaro Leonel Ramazzini Imeri was elected as president of the "conferencia episcopal de Guatemala" on January 23 2006, for the period 2006-2008, and he is the actual cathilic church leader.

Ref. [1]

Please don't change it back without propper references.

Cuete 08:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Most Modern City?

"The capital city remained Guatemala City which is still today the biggest and most modern city in Central America." Are there any sources to support that it is more modern than Panana City, San Salvador, or San Jose.

It's defenitely more modern than San Salvador, San José, etc. But Panama City may be the most modern due to their skyline, but I'm not sure.

Gtrojan 19:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

This is a subjective issue. How do we actually measure "modern"? By number of buildings? By kilometers of paved roads? "Biggest" could be justified based on city population or area, but "modern" is too subjective. Should be removed. mjuarez 07:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

National Anthem

The name of the national Anthem is not Guatemala Feliz. The anthem has no name and is known only as National Anthem of Guatemala. A change of name along with a different rhythm for the anthem was proposed in 1996, but it was rejected.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.230.140.32 (talk) 04:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Considerable Vandalism

There's a considerable amount of offensive vandalism to this page and it looks as though much of the actual content has been damaged. I'm not familiar enough with Wikipedia to make changes to the main page myself, but someone should seriously look into restoring a previous version of the page.

Thanks,

Yes, doing so, and blocking some of the worst vandals. -- Infrogmation 15:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on it, SqueakBox 18:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I requested page protection like 2 months ago, But I was rejected. Gtrojan 03:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Page protection wont solve a problem like this but it will stop genuine editors. We just need to watch it better, which I for one will be doing, SqueakBox 04:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

united fruit company

there is no mention of the united fruit company in this article, though there is a a fair amount of reference to the CIA. it seems pertinent to mention their (united fruit co.) part in the US sponsored atrocities. also, i believe che guevara was originally from guatemala? well, hopefully somebody more learned than i in central american politics and history could might have a bit to say 'bout this- thanks, don't remember my account name

Che Guevara Guatemalan? He was Argentinian. If we say United Fruit were behindany atrocities we need impeccable references in order not to libel the company, SqueakBox 00:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

For the record though, Che and Castro were in Guatemala prior to the US / United Fruit Company backed millitary coup which overthrew the left-leaning democratically elected government. This is coming from Jon Lee Anderson's bio of Che, but it's been a few years since I read it. Since that's a reasonable source (more or less politically neutral) I'll dig out the book soon and cite the appropriate pages. Scott.wheeler 15:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Map

What's with this map? The top-left (northwestern) corner of the Guatemala I know is decidedly pointier than that. --Homunq 18:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Indeed you are right but I have no idea how to go about changing that, other than downloading the map and changing it with an application on your own computer. it certainly should be fixed, SqueakBox 19:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Jewish Community

"There are also small but powerful Jewish community"

I know someone will probably accuse me of being oversensitive, but what does this mean exactly? 129.67.43.240 14:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

My guess is there arent many of them but they have lots of money, SqueakBox 14:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Also several politicians are Jewish. Gtrojan 19:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

References

We need references in this article please update and cited otherwise it will be disputed. alfiboy 19:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposed WikiProject

In my ongoing efforts to try to include every country on the planet included in the scope of a WikiProject, I have proposed a new project on Central America at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Central America whose scope would include Guatemala. Any interested parties are more than welcome to add their names there, so we can see if there is enough interest to start such a project. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 17:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Article in need of major revision

The article has undergone serious change since Authenticmaya began editing, mostly for the good, but some, unfortunately not so. The introductory part is too short, and the start of the history section is way too long. The entire article needs cleanup for grammar, spelling, and POV check. Someone with more time than I have right now should check against older versions to see if anything valuable has been lost. I also agree that the article is in major need of proper sourcing throughout. Perhaps we could come up with a core set of texts that we agree to use as the base of our work. I'll try to start a proper list soon.Notmyrealname 01:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm starting grammar/flow revisions, although it occurs to me that before I put any more effort into this, we should really rethink how much length is worth devoting to the history (there's WAY too much right now). Interestingly, very little of the Pre-Columbian stuff is mentioned in History of Guatemala, so a lot of this content could be transferred there. I've also noticed that a lot of this history text was copied and pasted from this website: http://www.authenticmaya.com/authentic_maya.htm
Feeeshboy 06:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

What's Going on With Guatemalan Facts?

I understand that there is little out there that can truly be cited as a source for information on Guatemala. Most of it deals with Demographics. Even the CIA website changes its facts. It seems as though many places online and many books have conflicting statistics for the population of Guatemala, though most seem equally legitimate as the previous one. I've read that the Indigenous population is 60% with Mestizos at around 30%, whites at 10%. Othe places state that the Indigenous population is 40%, with Mestizos at 55%, blacks at 4% and whites and others at 1%. Some places don't even mention a black population while others do, some places place the Asian population at 3% while others make no mention of it. It all changes. How are the demographics measured? As a Guatemalan, I grew up understanding that Ladino meant "non-Indigenous" to pretty much include all mestizos, whites, asians, blacks, etc., as well as Mayan indians who have adopted a Westernized lifestyle. That's the definition most Guatemalans I know give for Ladino. So why do so many websites claim "ladino" as only being Mestizos? I don't know how Guatemala measures its demographics? Are the Garifuna considered Indigenous Guatemalans? Some websites say yes. It's all confusing. If anyone could clear it up for me that'd be great. Also, what is up with the statistics for Guatemlans living outside the US? That also confuses me. Some websites used on other entries claim that there are around 350,000 Guatemlan citizens registered in the USA with about 200,000 estimated illegal while other places claim that there are 1.1 million Guatemalans citizens int he USA. Did the civil war claim 100,000 lives or 200,000 lives? Does Mexico have 10,000 Guatemalan citizens or 75,000 as other sources claim. It's confusing. I jusst want some clarification. Until there is any, I think the Guatemala entry and other entries for Latin American countries will always have uncited sources. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Saopabs83 (talk • contribs) 08:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC).

Also the statement about Guatemala being the most populous country in central america is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.206.16.35 (talk) 18:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Here is the problem, identity is very confusing. To get exact facts about who is ladino, quiche, ka'chickel ect...well it's impossible. Lots of authors have written about the difficulty of assigning identity in Guatemala. Very good is Hale's "Mas que un Indo" (its in English): basically identity is contextual. I will rewrite this part with actual academic sources about the percentages of indingenous people (which has to be an estimate, as someone might identify as indigenous in one context and non-indingenous in another) if i can get the support of other editors not to just immidietly change it back to the CIA factbook content. Garifuna are sometimes considered indigenous, but sometimes considered black. Also, we can't know exactly how many Guatemalans are living illegally anywhere, because they are living illegally! Or how many people exactly were killed in the civil war, because at that time Guatemala had no national registry for birth certificates or anything. However, we can find and cite the best estimates. -notenderwiggin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.236.169 (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

History

Can anyone fill in anything about the history of Guatemala between independence and 1945? That seems like a pretty glaring gap, and I don't even know how to begin editing the modern history section without understanding the historical context. Feeeshboy 06:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Guatemala is the largest nation in Central America? according to who or what document?

This is false, it is common knowledge that NICARAGUA is the largest country in the isthmus, followed by HONDURAS and only then GUATEMALA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.245.59.3 (talk) 22:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC).

actually Guatemala is the largest by population where as by size it falls in third place, revise your information.

Easier citations

I think that the entire article should have one citation.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.199.194.169 (talk) 16:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

US support

Did the US support to the Guatemalan government cease with the Carter administration as suggested in this article article or did it continue as suggested in Foreign Interventions of the Reagan Administration?Vints 07:51, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

The US Congress put restrictions on the type of aid that could be sent to Guatemala, however money, training, and other aid did continue. As part of the investigation into the cover up of Efrain Bamaca (the husband of a US human rights lawyer), it was revealed that military aid continued to flow (usually via the CIA) through the 1990s, despite the Congressional bans. This is the quick answer. I'll try to properly source this soon. Notmyrealname 04:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I shall request more information on the CIA/United Fruit takedown of the government, please... That's one of the most important things in the history of the country, and it warranted about a sentence. AlexRochon 21:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Latin cultures

Hello everyone! You may want to go to Latin cultures an participate in the article and discussion. There are a lot of disputed statements... The Ogre 12:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Education

"The government runs a number of public elementary and secondary-level schoolsand alow the children to yell and scream and do whatever they want to."

This is the first sentence in the Education Section. The highlighted part of the sentence is not a verifiable fact and should not be included in the article. I am not familiar with editing pages and would therefore appreciate someone correcting this. Thank you.

67.93.212.43 19:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Climate

Any ideas for a climate / weather section? Seems like it should at least be mentioned. User:Hopping T 00:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Flora & Fauna

I would like help starting, editing and completing the List of Guatemalan Flora and List of Guatemalan Fauna pages. I think they would be good and useful additions. Once I can gather more reference tools I plan on adding a great deal to them. Any and all help would be appreciated. IvanTortuga (talk) 18:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Guatemala not part of Yucatán?

User:Zinco335 has changed Colonial Guatemala to being governed from Yucatán. I don't recall ever hearing it that way. References, other comments? Curious, -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Possble vandalism

The History section consists only of one subsection, Pre-Columbian. The rest of the history of Guatemala is in a section called ==To Bad. This makes no sense to me. Is it vandalism? Ought we to change it? Smartguy777 (talk) 05:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC).

Crime??

I saw an interesting (although, grossly disturbing) documentary last night on the Documentary Channel about violent crimes committed against women in Guatemala. Very sad issues.....very serious! Maybe this article needs a "crimes" section. Buddpaul (talk) 17:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Name

I am interested in the origin and meaning of the name "Guatemala", but could not find it in the article. Anyone? Muad (talk) 09:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Its an aztec name "Goathemalan", it means Land of Forrest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.167.230 (talk) 23:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The article should make mention of the origin of the name. This claims it was named after Gautama Buddha in the 6th century, by a Chinese explorer Hui Shen. But I suspect that's rubbish. -- JackofOz (talk) 08:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Report but need a wee bit more info

I woud want from reports on states countrys you name it all more info on stuff like average temps,exports,imports,persentage wheels ect..... also I would put that info on other pages so we can make wikipedia more report friendly.

GO WIKIPEDIA!!!:):):):)--Mbratek4014 (talk) 23:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

July 2009 estimate?

Excuse me, but is that population figure supposed to say July 2009? If so, then it is a population projection and not a present-day statistic. Someone the Person (talk) 19:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

"El País de la eterna primavera"

I was looking at the motto that is currently on the fact box, but if I am not wrong, Guatemala is also called "El País de la eterna primavera" = the country of the eternal spring, which doesn´t appear anywhere on the article. CPS911 (talk) 02:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I think that's the tourism promotion slogan, not the national motto. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Population 13 million & 1?

In the infobox, it says for the Population "July 2008 estimate 13,000,001". How is there an estimate for 13 million and 1? My guess someone changed it for the humor and no one realized, I'm changing it to an even 13 million. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.151.139 (talk) 08:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Assume good faith?

Wikipedians want me to "Assume good faith" lol? What the Hell kind of stupidity is that, to COMMAND ASSUMPTION? Sorry, I'm a Christian, and Christians are forbidden to assume, but to go by EVIDENCE. Learn from that cultipedians of assumption and posting feelings-based nonsense and empty claims. What is with this non-neutral point of view pushing in the beginning where ridiculous nonsense was posted about arrowheads being proof that Earth is older than 6500 years? How do arrowheads prove that? Are you insane? So arrowheads in and of themselves is evidence of an age? WHAT? Directions to a mental ward anyone? And why are references missing for some of this absurdly-old-Earth claims? And why was it said that there was evidence that the first settlers of Guatemala were hunters and gatherers as if farming was a remote possibility for humans? Oh, let me guess, was is a subtle hint that early humans didn't know how to farm (manage things like a garden in Eden)? WEIRD.Truthforlife (talk) 16:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Languages

"It is common for indigenous Guatemalans to learn or speak between two to five of the nation's other languages, including Spanish." This is lacking citation, and contradict what I know from living and studying four months in the country. My experience tells me that extremely few ladinos speak any indigenous languages, that extremely few indigenous Mayans speak or understand another indigenous language than that of their own, since the indigenous languages are distinct from one another and there's little or no second language training in rural areas where the majority of the population lives. So I wonder where this information comes from, I think it is misleading at best.--Thomaselstedr (talk) 06:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Poverty

In the Economy section it is stated that "approximately 29%[25] of the population [lives] below the poverty line". The reference link is broken and the information is thus unverifiable. According to a number of different sources, the number is likely at least twice to three times as high. According to the CIA World Factbook (1) "more than half of the population" lives below the poverty line, an often quoted figure. According to NationMaster.com, the country ranks as the 17th poorest with a 56.2% (2004 survey) of the population below the poverty line. The most often cited definition is living for less than 2 US$ per day. According to Galdu.org, "According to official statistics, 51 percent of Guatemala’s 13 million people live in poverty, although non-governmental organisations (NGOs) put the proportion closer to 80 percent." The 80% is another figure rigorously cited, with half of that number, 40% being people living in extreme poverty. The site (4) states a figure of "perhaps 75% of the population below the poverty line." There are no sources cited for this, but the "more than half" and the "80/40" ratio of poverty/extreme poverty is cited in most places I've come across in all my studies in Guatemala. According to (5) "The United Nations estimates that 80% of the population lives in poverty (measured as a daily income of $2 USD or less) and half of those, 40% of the total population, live in extreme poverty (measured as a daily income of $1 USD or less)."

In either case, I believe the 29% is wildly underestimated, and lacking proper sources. I have bad experiences with editing articles, so I leave it to someone more experienced on this subject. But please review this disputed section.

1) https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gt.html#Econ
2) http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_pop_bel_pov_lin-economy-population-below-poverty-line
3) http://www.galdu.org/web/index.php?odas=2429&giella1=eng
4) http://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/2000/Guatemala.htm
5) http://www.plqe.org/politics.html --Thomaselstedr (talk) 06:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Caribbean Wikipedians' notice board

I would like to announce the establishment of the Wikipedia:Caribbean Wikipedians' notice board. Anyone with an interest in the Caribbean is welcome to join in. Guettarda 1 July 2005 04:02 (UTC)

== == Culture == ==

The culture section of this article is weak. Guatemalan culture is similar to the culture of other Latin American countries. "Much of the clothing and food is still made in the traditional Maya way." Not true. Perhaps in scattered rural areas, but the vast majority of people in Guatemala dress in the manner of Europeans and North Americans, and they buy their clothes in clothing stores. "Food is still made in the traditional Mayan way". Meaning what, exactly? Most Guatemalans shop for their food in markets or supermarkets, and cook it up on electric stoves.

I was checking out the BBC and I have not found any reference to support the claim that 'The abundance of sites has led the BBC to name Guatemala as the first cultural destination in the world'. There are some fairly positive quotations concerning Guatemala on this page though: Guatemala BBC . I would suggest that this reference be removed unless or until it can be substantiated. Markleci 12:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I just lived in Guatemala for two years and I can't believe the stuff on here. Guatemala is mostly indigenous and only in the several large cities do the majority of people wear western style clothing. There are 24 indigenous languages spoken, mostly versions of Maya. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.21.38.42 (talk • contribs)

I think perhaps most people living in urban Guatemala shop for clothes and food in market and supermarkets and maybe cook on electric or gas stoves and it is clear that once folks are working in an urban setting they no longer have time to make the traditional clothing (traje). However most Guatemalans Mayan or Ladino, live in rural areas, shop in weekly outdoor markets, cook with wood--often on open fires inside the homes. World Bank 2007 data says only 48% of the population is urban so "scattered rural" is not well applied to Guatemala. While urbanization is accelerating still the majority of the population is rural (cf US at over 80%.) I am not however restoring the text about "clothing and food" above to the main text because I don't have a citation & don't feel ready to make any major wikip. edits. Wikikd (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Motto

Is anyone able to provide a reference showing that El País de la Eterna Primavera really is the official motto? A Google search [2] hardly yields any results. Could it ust be a catchphrase to describe the country to foreigners? Pruneautalk 18:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Try this: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22land+of+eternal+spring%22&btnG=Search - 24,700 results;
or this: (in Spanish) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22pais+de+la+eterna+primavera%22&btnG=Search - 25,500 results. --ChaChaFut 02:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Those links only show that the phrase is used, they do not prove that it is the motto. Actually, if you add the word motto or lema, the number of results falls down to 55 and 42. Furthermore, the number of hits on Google is by no means a reliable source. I was actually looking for a government page talking about the motto, or perhaps a coin or note with the motto on it, for example, but I haven't found anything. Pruneautalk 17:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

"Pais de la eterna primavera" (The ever lasting spring country) motto is very popular amongst Guatemalans, not so sure in other places. I googled it in spanish an there's more than 21,000 results for it I think this should give some credibility to it.

But, the official motto used to promote Guatemala internationally, by the Guatemalan Turism Institute (INGUAT) is "Guatemala, soul of the earth".

I'd like to know what's the connotation of the motto required in this field. If it refers the motto used by Guatemalan people should be "Guatemala, the eternal spring country", but if it refers to internaltional promotion (marketing) should be "Guatemala, soul of the earth".

Cuete 05:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

"Guatemala, Alma de la Tierra" WTF is that?!! no one ever uses that in Guatemala, and it sounds stupid too. INGUAT uses the "Guatemala, soul of the earth" for English ONLY. Gtrojan 00:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not convinced that the motto of the tourism bureau is the same as the national motto. The fact that they want the world to know the country as "the soul of the world" looks like advertising, not an official motto. I can't get a clear answer on the official motto. Some sites say there is none [1], some say it's "Land of the Eternal Spring" [2], and a number say that it's "Libertad!"/"Freedom!" [3] [4] [5] Maybe this is just a mistake made because "Libertad" is on the flag? If so, it's a very common mistake. I'm starting to think that there is no official motto, just several commonly used ones. Feeeshboy 07:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


I'm a Guatemalan, and even that I've edited in Spanish I have no "rigths" to edit in english version (not even a username yet. It's true that Guatemala has not a Motto as for law. The one "Pais de la eterna primavera" (http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guatemala&diff=prev&oldid=19821271). I setted this. It is the motto that is used to identify my country. To answer some comments:

  • Yes "Pais de la eterna primavera" (Everspring Country) is our motto.
  • Maybe it proves that saying that I'm a Guatemalan living heres for all my 26 years :)
  • The mottos that Inguat uses are more like slogans; "Guatemala, soul of the earth", "Guatemala country of magic and color" are two examples and yes. They are used only to promote Guatemala over the world, but those are just that, slogans.
  • Those slogans are just that
  • "Guatemala, Alma de la tierra" does not sound stupid!! Guatemala has a very antique religious tradition (mayan and Catholic later and today).
  • The so called motto that appears in here is in a 5 cent coin (http://img1.mlapps.com/jm/img?s=MLM&f=22307755_8137.jpg&v=T), but it's just used for the national tree (Ceiba Pentandra) that for the mayans was the communication with the underworld (Xibalba) and this earth. They where so mistique that this motto is used for the tree only.
  • No one thought that the motto could be "Dios Unión Libertad" that are inscripted over the Directive board at the Sessions Room of the Guatemalan Congress (http://www.congreso.gob.gt/uploadimg/fotos/n3014.jpg and http://dca.gob.gt:85/archivo/070913/NACION1PAG2.jpg). But no. That was the motto for the Centralamerican Federation.

Please!! SOMEONE CHANGE IT!! Thanks!! :) --Cancuen (talk) 06:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


For "Pais de la eterna primavera" I've seen English translations "Land of eternal spring" or "Land of eternal springtime" (also the variation "Maya land of eternal spring"). The question, I think, is not if the phrase is used, but if it is officially the national motto by government decree. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 16:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Bias

Like many of the articles on Central American countries, the History section is pure PC bull. - U.S. aid to the Guate government is emphasized, but no mention of Sandinista and Cuban aid to the guerillas, leading the reader to believe that they were a sort of spontaneous peasant uprising. - no mention of URNGs atrocities and forced conscription, as detailed in UN truth commission report. -No mention of Arbenz nationalizing private property and being surrounded by avowed communists. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3711379.Arbenz_y_yo - The contention that the U.S. backed "genocide" is pretty fringe. The genocide label itself to describe what the guatemalan military did is controversial, given that there is no evidence people were targeted because they belonged to a certain ethnic group. Menchu's account has been thoroughly discredited. See David Stoll's work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Stoll

The narrative of the Spanish embassy presented in this article is the leftist version. There should be a reference to the locally accepted history which is that the protestors accidentally lit the fire that killed them. They were the ones that brought in the Molotov cocktails in the first place, and kidnapped the embassy workers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironchuck (talk • contribs) 17:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Oil production

This country is also a small producer of oil. See this site: [Oil] to read about the level of production in Guatemala.Agre22 (talk) 11:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)agre22

Vandalism Again

C'mon , at least partial lock, almost 2 minutes i saw another vandalism.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tian2992 (talk • contribs) 20:55, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

Religious Counts

There's a bit in here claiming that 1.65% of the population are members of the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day-Saints, citing LDS literature. If you look at unaffiliated data, 98.1% of the population is Catholic, Protestant, unaffiliated, or Mayan. This is all possible, but do we have a source unaffiliated with LDS that could give accurate numbers on all of these religions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imagine002 (talk • contribs) 05:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Consistency/Basic Standards

This article claims, "El Mirador was by far the most populated city in pre-Columbian America." There is no source given for this information. The Wikipedia article on El Mirador says it had a population of perhaps 100,000. The Wikipedia article on Tenochtitlan, the Aztec city, says it had a population of more than 200,000. The population claim for El Mirador needs proper sourcing and must be made consistent with the rest of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.157.102 (talk) 23:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Geolocation

The geolocation of the Guatemala article (as shown in Google Earth, for instance) is incorrect and places Guatemala somewhere in the Galapagos archipelago. I believe the true coordinates should be: 15,46,59 N and 90,16,26 W; instead of 0,38,08 N and 90,29,54 W. Alphast 09:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I think your software is corrupted because I just checked this and the coordinates looks fine. Guate-man (talk) 18:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Independence day

Why does the independence day for Guatemala (and all Central America) is 15 september 1821? Central America was part of the New Spain and then part of the First Mexican Empire until it seceeded in 1823. Shouldn't the independence date be 1823 and from Mexico? Or in any case, shouldn't indepence be set until after the dissolution of the United Provinces of Central America, since Guatemala wasn't an independent country until then? --Alonso 19:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Guatemalan independence is celebrated in September 15th (1821). The independence from Spain. In June 1st, 1823 was the date that the Federal Congress agreed to declare that Independence was from Spain, Mexico and any other territories (note still referencing Sept 15th). On March 21th 1847, Guatemala officially separtes from the Federation. Was the last country to do it. No one celebrates that we are now appart. All the countries that belonged to the federation (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua and Costa Rica) celebrates our Independency Day on September 15th. --Cancuen (talk) 06:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

The independence we celebrate is the independence from Spain of 1821. That 15 of September the General Captaincy of Guatemala was declared independent of Spain. The Captaincy was a single unit more dependent on Spain than on Mexico for administrative purposes. Still, that day the adhesion of Tuxtla, Comitán, Ciudad Real and Chiapas to the "Pan de Iguala" was received and, by the end of that morning, the Independence Act of the General Captaincy had been written and signed. It was sent to us (I'm from Costa Rica) and it arrived to Costa Rica (the southernmost of the provinces) on October 13.

After that different efforts were conducted to implement an adhesion to Iturbide's empire in Mexico and later to implement a Federal Republic of Central America, but those failed finally failed.

After the independence from Spain the adhesion to Iturbide's Empire in Mexico and to a Central American Republic were optional: those were not imposed on our political class.

Even today there are different efforts, somewhat unsuccessful, to unify Central America: the SICA (Central American Integration System), the Central American Court, the Central American Parliament... but those are plagued by different politics and cases of corruption and not all of the Central American Nations are members of all of these institutions.

One could formulate the same question in different context: Why to all of the United States celebrate independence day on the 4th of July? How does this affect Texas, California, Louisiana, Alaska, Hawaii... --200.6.194.3 (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

It is dated like that because the independence was From Spain. There's no shuch thing as mexican empire independece day. Seems not important due to the fact that the only thing that existed afterwards was a confederation of countries in which Mexico also figured. it didnt work and the countries split. Mexico claimed Chiapas as part of their own, even though it was Guatemalan territory —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jitazoe33 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Name

The Book of Lists two advances the theory that it may have been named by a Buhddist preist who travele there in the 400s after Gautama Buhdda. Should this be mentionhed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.74.174.161 (talk) 17:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

>>>>Is there sufficient historical evidence for that? Linguistic evidence on its own, especially stemming from times when oral traditions were more common than written ones, is not enough to stand on its own. However, linguistic evidence can back-up historical evidence. For example, the name of the boat that the Chumash of California used to use and the similar word used for the same style of boat in Polynesia is a good use of linguistic evidence to back up the engineering evidence already confirmed relating to the building of that type of boat. Nevertheless, the similarity between Gautama and Guatemala is not in itself sufficient to prove such a link. Consider, Japanese "miru" and Spanish "mirar" for "to look" or Japanese "namae" and English "name" or Haitian Creole "Bagay" and Tagalog (Filipino) "bagay," which both mean "thing" in those languages. Is there some reason all of these language have the same word? Coincidence is the only outcome for lack of historical proof. Also, if, let's say, there was linguistic contact, the occurrence of it would have been so long ago that natural phonological changes would lead to much different words, as in related languages in Indo-European. The changes between Gautama and Guatemala, from a diachronic linguistic perspective do not lend themselves to 2400 years of change in two completely unrelated languages (in my opinion, probably Quiche and Sanskrit, right?). 74.233.8.175 (talk) 18:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC) Tom

Why not call the Guerilla fighters what they were?

The guerilla fighters were not fighters, rather they were death squads, and the fact that they have been credulously labelled as otherwise appears to ignore the Reagenite administrations hand in the "governance" of the country.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Somehow, neither side would admit that they were actually death squads, and because they're the only ones who can give "reliable"(that mean acceptable by Wikipedia's admins) sources about themselves, we can't say that... 173.183.69.134 (talk) 14:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Historical and actual facts like thounsands of secret and non secret documents, many mass graves and the terrible storys of the survivors show that the participation of the US-Goverment was a powerful support to the most terrible dictators in Guatemala. The guatemalan army was following instructions from those dictators who only wanted to please them selves in war against "democracy", the US-Goverment in war against the "soviets" and the US-Investors in war against the "landless peasants". If the US-Goverment want to support "democracy", they should never support dictators like they in several cases do. If the US-Goverment wants to support democracy in Guatemala they must help to bring all those murders to jail in exchange for what they have done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.225.40.205 (talk) 07:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

List of Journalists

That list certainly does not belong here. It might be quite relevant on a different level / in a separate article on journalism, press, media, etc. 178.83.163.146 (talk) 10:49, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Problem with all Guatemala park articles

There are lots of WP articles about parks in Guatemala, and many of these reference the CONAP website here: http://www.conap.gob.gt/. That website must have been changed substantially because it appears that most article links are broken. This is an issue because for many of these articles the CONAP link was the only one (including the only reference on the CONAP article itself). You can find many of these broken links by searching WP for SIGAP (Sistema Guatemalteco de Áreas Protegidas). In addition, the CONAP article needs to be expanded to include information about the SIGAP. Cheers!--Jarhed (talk) 05:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Here is another resource that looks pretty good: http://conap.online.fr/primera.htm. Jarhed (talk) 05:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Broken links can be a problem, though in this case it is just a question of finding the current location of the file and updating the url. I have done this for all references to the CONAP listing I could find. In case I missed one or two, this is the updated reference: <ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.conap.gob.gt/Members/admin/documentos/documentos-centro-de-documentacion/areas-protegidas/SIGAPublico_Enero.xls/view | publisher=conap.gob.gt | title=Listado de Áreas Protegidas (enero, 2011) | author=CONAP | accessdate=2011-06-14 | format=xls |language=Spanish}}</ref> Regards -- Arjuno (talk 07:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:GuatemalaHimno.ogg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:GuatemalaHimno.ogg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 29 February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:GuatemalaHimno.ogg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:46, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Nonexistent 2007 Census

The country info box makes reference to a 2007 census. The last Guatemalan census was conducted in 2002 and the next one is scheduled for 2013 as you can see from this article (in Spanish). This needs to be fixed. (Rindolphus (talk) 09:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC))

Citation of Decreto 19-2003 on national languages

The article says:

According to Decreto Número 19-2003, twenty-three dialects are unrecognized as National Languages.[49]

First, 'unrecognized' should probably be 'recognized'. Second, the text referenced never mentions a number of "dialects" (or the word "dialect", for that matter; it talks about "Mayan languages", which indeed I believe is linguistically more correct); rather, it delegates technical decisions on the matter to the Academy of Mayan Languages of Guatemala. 177.120.17.219 (talk) 01:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Issues with religion stats

The state department document which is cited as a reference for adherence statistics is at odds with the numbers cited in the text. In particular it does not include the 3% Orthodox number, which by my calculation has been back-figured from the claim of 520K converts. As far as I am aware this is a church-reported number and is thus not comparable with other estimates. The LDS numbers are similarly problematic. I'm dubious about the reports of conversions anyway given the lack of sources. Mangoe (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


The actual number of conversions to Orthodoxy from 'Orthodox Catholic Church of Guatemala (OCCG)' is more modest. Accounts vary between 120,000 and 150,000, initially received by Archbishop ATHENAGORAS, hierarch of the Greek Orthodox Metropolis of Mexico, Central America, Columbia, Venezuela, and the Caribbean Islands under the jurisdiction of the Oecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople in 2010, and administered by Archimadrite Andrés Girón (former Guatemalan Senator and presidential candidate) as Vicar. More research is needed in this area, but some links for starters are http://www.svots.edu/headlines/seminarian-jesse-brandow-gives-first-hand-account-explosion-orthodox-christianity-guatemal and http://www.oodegr.com/english/ierapostoli/xwres/Guatemala/latin_america_orthodoxy.htm . I'm not where I can edit this article at the moment, but will try to do so as time permits.SrLoco (talk) 10:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Journalism

This:

Journalism
There are seven. national newspapers in TV, some of them being Noti7, Telecentro Trece and Noticiero Guatevision. The Guatemala Times is a digital English news magazine.

makes no sense. 86.185.216.244 (talk) 21:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

History section in lead

The lead currently has a rather wishy-washy sentence about 20th centurey Guatemalan history. "Early in the 20th century, Guatemala had a mixture of democratic governments as well as a series of dictators, the last of which were frequently assisted by the United Fruit Company and the United States government." is how it currently reads. There is hardly any controversy about the broad contours of what actually happened; dictatorship with US/UFC support until 1944, ten years of more or less democracy, US/UFC instigated coup followed by dictatorship again, which led to the civil war. I am currently not in a frame of mind to improve the phrasing, but if no objections are raised I plan to do so soon. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Whitewash

> From 1960 to 1996, Guatemala underwent a bloody civil war fought between the U.S.-backed government and leftist rebels, which included massacres of the Mayan population perpetrated by the former in the Ixil Triangle.

Looks like stuff i have seen before. Stories intended to whitewash history by pretending it was particular groups referenced into wikipedia without proper counterpoint. The other case was East Timor. Similarly dubious is the claim that it is a representative democracy.88.159.79.223 (talk) 09:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

New Health Article

Hi everyone. I am a college student and for one of my class projects, I have decided to write a new article about Health in Guatemala. I was wondering if anyone had any advice for this new article. I would also add some information to this health section in order to make it more well-rounded. I would appreciate any feedback. Thank you! Annkat22 (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Annkat22. I have been working on several Spanish and English articles for Guatemala. Among those, I expanded the articles es:José Felipe Flores -famous 18th century Guatemalan physician-, es:Hospital San Juan de Dios (Guatemala) -Guatemalan largerst general hospital- and es:Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, the College of Medicine of Guatemala's only public University, all in Spanish. I could translate them into English if you think that will be value added to your work. Regards.--Nerdoguate (talk) 23:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi everybody. I have decided to move forward with this Health in Guatemala project and have posted a brief summary of what I plan to do for the article on my sandbox. I plan to discuss in detail the Guatemalan health care system itself, and its implications on children, women, Mayans, and education. I will cover some of the most prevalent conditions and how they affect these different groups of people within the country. If anyone is interested, please check out my sandbox summary and provide me with any feedback. I am willing to learn from all of you and I would love whatever information you have to offer. Also, for further information on what I am proposing to talk about, I have attached this link below to a google doc that explains in detail my proposal for the entire article. Thank you so much. https://docs.google.com/a/rice.edu/document/d/1sWP2ahm0QB7m6O_fUZ1VBtIkP2BMMmKQPSPh0z4xHSk/edit?usp=sharing Annkat22 (talk) 04:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Crime

I would like to see a section on crime like many other country specific pages have Gautam Discuss 06:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Guatemala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:50, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Remember those? Is there some reason why those editing this article have such a problem coming up with a source for who is the new VP? There have been any number of reversions back and forth on this alone, but there is also constant introduction of unsourced and often POV content that keeps pouring in from those who seem to think that sources are optional. They are not. Evensteven (talk) 06:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Added reliable sources for Alfonso Fuentes Soria's appointment as VP. Regards.--Nerdoguate (talk) 23:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

this is the besets site to get info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F733:8100:1145:34B7:95BB:83EE (talk) 01:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on Guatemala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Ubico section

The Ubico section seems a bit unbalanced to me. While it (correctly) notes that his regime was oligarchical and guilty of grave human rights abuses, it omits a lot of facts. Ubico was initially (at least during the first six years of his regime) very popular (of course, he was widely despised by the mid-forties); he virtually eliminated crime and corruption in Guatemala; he contributed substantially to the development of the country's infrastructure (the number of roads increased almost five-fold and Guatemala became an exporter of several crops that it previously imported); etc. Ubico had his good and his bad traits. I'm not saying that his good traits cancel out the bad ones or that we should overstate them while downplaying the bad, but it would be nice if a more complete picture of him and his regime was presented. Josh (talk) 05:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

I disagree on this. They were fascistic and oligarchical and emphasizing the truth doesn't need to be balanced with untruths.YatesByron (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)YatesByron

Grammatical Question

...a United Nations-backed prosecutor described the administration of Pérez Molina to a crime syndicate...

Depending upon what the original writer meant, this should probably read either, "...a United Nations-backed prosecutor described the administration of Pérez Molina as a crime syndicate..." or, "...a United Nations-backed prosecutor compared the administration of Pérez Molina to a crime syndicate..." ☺ Dick Kimball (talk) 14:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Guatemala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Indian reservations

Does Guatemala has Indian reservations like this: Lands inhabited by indigenous peoples--Kaiyr (talk) 16:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Guatemala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Guatemala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guatemala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Original research and or unreferenced

@Thinker78: The article has been tagged since June 2018 as original research and or unreferenced. It would be useful to know which specific parts of the article require improvement. This is because the article is fairly long and some parts seem to be adequately referenced. Jonpatterns (talk) 15:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

I removed the original research tag. Regarding the "unreferenced" tag, you can use the "find" tool of your browser and write in it "citation needed" and you will see the portions of the article that are tagged with "citation needed". In addition, if you scroll down the article, you will see very soon text without inline citations. Thinker78 (talk) 21:00, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Content on Marriage/Childbearing

Hello,

I recently added content that further elaborated on the subject of the high infant mortality rates in Guatemala. My content was removed. I would like to know the reason behind that.

Thank you! Lopck12 (talk) 05:56, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Lopck12

Additional Sections

I believe there should be an additional subsection on dances in Guatemala, under the culture section. This could be a subsection of music or be it's own section.

Leolevineaquino (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Sports

Football

In this section, it is not explained that Football in Guatemala is like soccer in the United States of America. Leolevineaquino (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Other Sports

In the "Other Sports" section, there are no actual facts or information written in this section. Only links. I believe there should be a couple sentences to discribe other sports in Guatamala that aren't already highlighted in the sports section Leolevineaquino (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Human Rights

There is a table in this section that isn't formatted well. Part of the table is centered and part of it is not centered. Leolevineaquino (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Society

Diaspora

In this section there is a table that isn't formatted well. All columns or rows should all be centered, or aligned to the left or right, not a combination of all three. Leolevineaquino (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The territorial dispute

should we show the territorial dispute between Belize and Guatemala on the map? with other countries where their is territorial disputes we have (e.g. Russia and Ukraine) of course in this case Guatemala doesn't occupy the territory under a de facto control, but there is a claim and I think we should show on the map that that is the case in some way. Xander11012 (talk) 16:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Suggestion for sections on education and science and technology

Hi, just a suggestion, many country articles have sections or subsections for 'education' and 'science and technology', these could be sections on this article as well.

Thanks

John Cummings (talk) 11:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2018 and 22 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lopck12. Peer reviewers: Alejandrosalva.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2018 and 22 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ahernandez2020.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Poverty

Poverty section is out of date Percy2345 (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://www.politicalinformation.net/encyclopedia/Guatemala.htm
  2. ^ http://mayanmedicalaid.org/travel_info.htm
  3. ^ http://www.lssweb.net/lss_eng/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=74&Itemid=61
  4. ^ http://www.studentsoftheworld.info/country_information.php?Pays=GTM
  5. ^ http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/06/en/t/team/country.html?team=gua
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Guatemala/Archive_1&oldid=1168086031"