User talk:Agre22

Hello, Agre22! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kingturtle (talk) 11:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Dr. Júlio Afrânio Peixoto

Estou às ordens para colaborar.--Wloveral (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Foi você quem ampliou aquele meu artigo sobre o Dr. J. A. Peixoto?

Fui, mas é você que tem de continuar. Eu li somente um livro dele. Também, sei nada sobre eugenética, somente que era um "fad" depois de Dalton, nos anos iniciais do século vinte. Lembro-me que a cabeça do Lampião era decepada e levada do sertão à cidade de Salvador onde ficou durante décadas na Faculdade de Medicine para estudos, para provar que ele tinha um crânio criminoso. Acho que era uma maneira de dizer que a vida dura do sertão não era responsável pelos fora-da-lei cangaceiros e, sim, um acidente de genética. Afrânio Peixoto, como uma criança dos seus tempos, foi levado a acreditar que genes faziam o criminal. O racismo "científico" ainda não morreu: muita gente só quer lavar as mãos quando qualquer diferença é "provada"−em vez de trabalhar para dar a todos as raças as mesmas oportunidades que somente os ricos desfrutaram. Me lembro da discussão sobre a suposta "sub-raça" dos nordestinos que eram mal nutridos na infância. E isto foi nos anos 80. Vá fundo. Interesso-me pelo resto da história de Afrânio Peixoto. Quero ver aonde via o artigo. Feliz editoração. Abraço, Bill--Wloveral (talk) 00:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Parte da disputa entre Afrânio Peixoto e Carlos Chagas está no artigo sobre o segundo.--Wloveral (talk) 00:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page usage

Dear Agre22; Wikipedia has guidelines on talk page usage, WP:TALK. Your edit to Talk:Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations appears to be noncompliant.[1] "Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views." Also, WP:BLP says, "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space." I have removed your comment. Please review the cited guidance. Walter Siegmund (talk) 14:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Woodrow Wilson

I don't know if he went "mad" per se in 1919 but he did have a stroke which left him incapacitated. I don't know if the stroke occured in 1919 but it did happen to him--Briaboru (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Romildo Ribeiro Soares

A tag has been placed on Romildo Ribeiro Soares requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Goochelaar (talk) 22:22, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page use / BLP concern

Hi. Please be aware that the purpose of talk pages is "for discussion of the content of articles and the views of reliable published sources." In particular, "Talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views." (from Wikipedia:Talk page).

Discussions on talk pages should be focused on ways of improving the article, and are not provided as soapboxes for editors to air their views on the subject matter of the article. Special care must be taken when discussing living persons to make certain comments are not libelous, as the requirements of the policy "Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons" apply to article namespace and talk pages alike. It's for this reasons that I've deleted your comment on the talk page for the article on Bernie Madoff. --Rrburke^(talk) 14:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Salvador Mazza

A tag has been placed on Salvador Mazza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Alexf^(talk) 23:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wrong about the bombings

Just wanted to let you know that you are wrong, the British bombed German cities before anyone else bombed anyone else. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Npovshark (talk • contribs) 18:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JWs

I have removed your blog-like post at the JW talk page. You have not suggested any improvements to the article. The Talk page is not for anti- (or pro-) JW rants.--Jeffro77 (talk) 01:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the fifth time you have been warned about using talk pages as a forum. Consider it your last warning, do it again and you will be blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Your actions are being discussed at WP:ANI#Agre22. Looie496 (talk) 02:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 16:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnar Dahlberg

Hello, I went through article created relatively recently, and saw Gunnar Dahlberg created by you. Using the label "racist" twice in a short stub of 526 byte was not very encyclopedic, so please keep an encyclopedic tone if you contribute additional articles. Tomas e (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

discussion at ANI

Your behavior is being discussed, yet again, at WP:ANI#Continuing series of unconstructive edits. Looie496 (talk) 23:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Agre I just took a look at a contribution of yours regarding the schizophrenia talkpage and while I am sure that there are many people interested in what you'd have to tell them regarding your knowledge on schizophrenia this really isn't the best place for that. If you can propose any article changes or such then we'd absolutely love to hear about it but please try to refrain from making edits like the one previously mentioned again.

Atte,--194x144x90x118 (talk) 00:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for tendentious, soap box editing despite being warned and blocked recently. Please note that a continuation of this style of editing can result in an indefinite block. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. --VS ^talk 04:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

==Unfair to me-- You were unfair to me.Agre22 (talk) 00:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

I disagree I think that the block was fair and that you really could try a little bit harder to just stick to the talk page guidelines.--194x144x90x118 (talk) 14:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Karvardi

A tag has been placed on Karvardi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gurgel Delta

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gurgel Delta, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Falcon8765 (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Viva Brasil

A tag has been placed on Viva Brasil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheSmuel (talk) 20:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Viva Brasil

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Viva Brasil. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Articles

Hello Agre22. In order for an organisation to merit an article on Wikipedia it is not enough that it exists or even that somebody states that it is important. It must be notable for which there are guidelines. Notability must be demonstrated by providing reliable secondary sources. Otherwise articles about such organisations are likely to be deleted. --TheSmuel (talk) 21:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grupo Guararapes

A tag has been placed on Grupo Guararapes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheSmuel (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Movimento dos Atingidos por Barragens

A tag has been placed on Movimento dos Atingidos por Barragens requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. XXX antiuser 19:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MAB Article

It's up to you (or other editors) to provide reliable sources that verify and attest the importance of the movement. The tag must be kept in place until notability is verified.

Cabe a você (ou outros editores) adicionar referências confiáveis que estabeleçam e verifiquem a importância do movimento. A tag deve ser mantida enquanto não for verificada a notoriedade do movimento. - XXX antiuser 19:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Francisco Tenório Cerqueira Júnior

A tag has been placed on Francisco Tenório Cerqueira Júnior requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He has importance. Even the wikipedia in Portuguese has an article [Pianist] about this Brazilian pianist. My article must remains. He is missing since March 17,1976.

Speedy deletion nomination of União Nacional dos Estudantes

A tag has been placed on União Nacional dos Estudantes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 01:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Veiculo Lançado de Microssatelites

The article Veiculo Lançado de Microssatelites has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A link to a non-English article. Notability not established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Veiculo Lançador de Microssatelites

The article Veiculo Lançador de Microssatelites has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A link to a non-English article. Notability not established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Veiculo Lançador de Microssatelites

A tag has been placed on Veiculo Lançador de Microssatelites, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. L0b0t (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tradição, Família e Propriedade

A tag has been placed on Tradição, Família e Propriedade, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. L0b0t (talk) 23:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Latham Doherty

I removed the speedy tag, but I would recommend finding some sources pretty soon to avoid having content deleted. If you need help, give us a yell. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of União Democrática Ruralista

The article União Democrática Ruralista has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Claims notability of a Brazilian right-wing association, without any relevant details or independent citations in English

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Placid Oil

A tag has been placed on Placid Oil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bfigura ^(talk) 02:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Agre22. Yes, I did place a tag on the article stating that I felt it was a candidate for deletion (the guidelines for which are here). I didn't actually delete the article, that would have been handled by an administrator who looked at the page after I tagged it, and agreed with my assessment. If you'd like the article to be brought back so that you can work on it, that can be done. Best, --Bfigura ^(talk) 21:28, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Braspetro

A tag has been placed on Braspetro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Walter K. Link

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Walter K. Link, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.geology.wisc.edu/outcrop/01/01pdfs/Linkages_R_Dott.pdf. As a copyright violation, Walter K. Link appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Walter K. Link has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Walter K. Link and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Walter K. Link with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Walter K. Link.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Salih (talk) 19:42, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Majnoon Field

A tag has been placed on Majnoon Field requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
>>>> Posted By Alex Waelde (Leave Me A Messgae) 18:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Walter K. Link

A tag has been placed on Walter K. Link requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - 2/0 (cont.) 15:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In future, please do not remove a speedy deletion template from an article you have created. Instead, us {{hangon}}, which still invites outside review. I have cleaned up the sentences that were copied directly into that article - please remember to state matters in your own words except when clearly marked quotations are needed. Using multiple sources can help with this, as well as the related issue of close paraphrasing. Regards, - 2/0 (cont.) 06:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ecology Talk and Fox News

I rolled back your unhelpful comment and link to the Fox News opinion article. It clearly does not serve to move the article forward in regards to content or even commentary. Ecology is in no way a pseudoscience as you have stated. If you would read the article on psuedoscience and the one on ecology you would realize this. Ecology is a well established and respected science in everyway, it's job is to understand the "interaction of organisms with each other and with the non-living environment." Furthermore, the article you link to is not about ecology as a science but rather environmentalism and in particular the policy surrounding global climate change.

In the future please refrain from posting inflammatory links which serve no purpose towards furthering the creation of an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a discussion board. Thanks...Earthdirt (talk) 16:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I protesta against your vandalism. You wrote: " Ecology is in no way a pseudoscience as you have stated. If you would read the article on psuedoscience and the one on ecology you would realize this. Ecology is a well established and respected science in everyway, it's job is to understand the "interaction of organisms with each other and with the non-living environment.".

Well, what ecology is correct. There was global cooling thirty years ago, because of human activity. Today, there's global warming, also because of human activity. And what does interaction of organisms with each other and with the non-living environment, has with Greenpeace and WWF? Agre22 (talk) 13:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

I have no interest in debating climate change with you on any level. However I will point out that Greenpeace and WWF are completely unrelated to the ecology article which is purely about the science of ecology. WWF employees a number of scientists, but it is an environmental conservation group (not a group of ecologists). Greenpeace is purely an environmental organization. Hope this clarifies things for you. Earthdirt (talk) 01:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You said nothing.Agre22 (talk) 18:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

"There was global cooling thirty years ago, because of human activity." -- This is false. -- 98.108.215.32 (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wilson Simonal

A tag has been placed on Wilson Simonal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 20:43, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guerrillas and generals

The article Guerrillas and generals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book by non-notable author.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 03:24, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Pages

Article talk pages, such as the one that you commented on for Women in the military, are meant to be discussions for how to improve the articles, not general forums about the subject of the article. Please keep your comments on article talk pages centered upon the articles themselves and how to improve them in the future. Thank you. Asarelah (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul H. Lewis

The article Paul H. Lewis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:Notability (academics)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 00:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

Please see my talk page at [2] for what needs to be added to the article, just to start off with. I removed the prod as reviewing administrator, but now you should put in the details. Any librarian can help you find book reviews, but some of them are usually in google scholar.

I see in general you have been writing extremely brief articles. some of the ones that have been deleted or marked for deletion might well have had no trouble if you had written them more fully. I'd suggest a re-reading of WP:BIO and our guide to writing Wikipedia articles. There is also the fuller discussion in chapter 6 of the free online version of How Wikipedia Works by Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, and Ben Yates (also available in print) DGG ( talk ) 01:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prostitution

Please stop adding comments on the talk pages of Eva Perón and Isabel Perón labeling them as "prostitutes". Beyond being unverifiable information, that can be considered defamatory by both their political supporters and by Isabel herself if it comes to that. MBelgrano (talk) 19:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Article's talk pages are used for discussing the article and how to improve it. External links can be used as references to explain somethings that you may desire to add to the article, but not if the sole purpose of a thread is to say "hey, there a page about this here". Instead of just providing the link, explain what is there in the link and what do you propose to do with the article about it. MBelgrano (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Left-wing organisations of Brazil

I have proposed that Category:Left-wing organisations of Brazil, which you created, should be either deleted or renamed. Your comments would be welcome in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 23#Category:Left-wing_organisations_of_Brazil. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs)

Silas Malafaia

You might want to check out WP:MOS, as the Silas Malafaia article you created does not conform to WP's MOS. You should also check out WP:Citing sources on how to properly format citations. Regards, PDCook (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian military government

Please, do not erase comments made by other editors (including non-registered) again. It's not up to you to judge if they are false or wrong and anyyone has the right to share its thoughts. If you don't like it, complain with an administrator, but do not erase it. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 18:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Just a quick note: You might want to check out WP:Citing sources, as I noticed you used a non-standard method of citing the sources in the Thomas John Gerrard article. I highly recommend using the <ref> and </ref> tags. Regards, PDCook (talk) 18:38, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm not sure how this reference confirms that the subject was a priest. PDCook (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK the new reference looks better, but can you please cite it properly per WP:Citing sources? If you don't know how, you can mimic the way I did with the other citations in the article. Regards, PDCook (talk) 19:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Pivot of Civilization

Greetings again. I would like to point out that book titles should be italicized. Furthermore, the book itself is not considered a valid reference and thus this article is currently unreferenced. Regards, PDCook (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those references still aren't independent. I also really wish you would read and understand WP:MOS and WP:Citing sources, but you seem resistant to my suggestions. I guess other people will have to continue to clean up your articles. PDCook (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For example, in the Guerrillas and Generals article, a book review is referenced that at least indicates some degree of notability of the work. Regards, PDCook (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Vegetarianism

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Vegetarianism are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. -kotra (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Blood of the Nation

This is another article you created that needs references. Please add independent reliable sources. PDCook (talk) 02:28, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also Woman and the New Race. Be careful to properly capitalize book titles. PDCook (talk) 02:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improper use of talk page

This is an improper use of a talk page. The talk page is there to discuss improvements to the article, not advertise various topics. Please cease misusing talk pages or someone will surely bring this to ANI. PDCook (talk) 02:42, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As other editors have said, please don't use talk pages for general chat about a subject. Wikipedia is not a forum, talk pages are only for the discussion of improvements to the article. --McGeddon (talk) 23:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Time to ban this guy again??? [3] Who wants to start the ANI? Ryan4314 (talk) 15:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please the book The Pivot of Civilization was really writen by Margaret Sanger. Facts are facts and that's all.Agre22 (talk) 15:44, 15 January 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

I'm not doubting this, but you need to provide independent sources that demonstrate notability. Furthermore, the article you state " In this book(1) there's complete support to eugenics. It is dedicated to Alice Drysdale Vickery (1),(2). Its introduction was written by the eugenist H. G. Wells (1),(2).", which is technically original research, since you only provide the book itself as a reference. Please be aware of WP policies, as many people are getting upset about your edits and further action could be taken. Regards, PDCook (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Return to continued tendentious editing - despite previous block for similar edits - your next edits of a similar nature will result in an indefinite block.. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. --VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 20:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You were unfair with me.Agre22 (talk) 00:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Salaries in US army

See US military pay grades. --Ysangkok (talk) 23:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went to see this site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Pay Agre22 (talk) 14:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Proposed deletion of Morris Steggerda

The article Morris Steggerda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ryan4314 (talk) 01:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Blood of the Nation

The article The Blood of the Nation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, no 3rd party refs

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ryan4314 (talk) 01:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tessa Savick

A tag has been placed on Tessa Savick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. iBen^talk/_contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 20:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block & then re-blocked to prevent email

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued tendentious editing - you have returned to editing for the express purpose of adding point of view comments and original research in a number of articles - despite reasonable warnings to desist. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 23:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have received your immediate email (and the previous one) in regards to your being blocked again. I choose not to return by email to you because of the way you have chosen to put your comments and questions to me via that medium. You have been given ample warnings to not return to wikipedia as a point of view warrior - especially in regards to posting original research into talk pages - across multiple articles. This is a community encyclopaedia that requires balanced information to be posted by editors; and disruption of that process by yourself - especially after 3 previous blocks - does not lend itself to achievement of such an objective.--VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 23:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sir, please pay attention to my messages. I am not prepared to discuss this matter with you via email - as detailed above. Your continued attempts to do so have now also been blocked. As an editor you are entitled to place an unblock claim and another administrator will consider your request - unblocking will not occur if you simply send me emails that are critical and somewhat rude. I do not lightly take the action of blocking editors indefinitely - and only do so if, for the good of the community and the project, there appears to be no other way to handle the situation. Such a conclusion usually occurs after a number of shorter blocks - and especially so when the editor in question simply returns to previous editing patterns upon return of a shorter block. That is the case that your edits present to the community at this time. --VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 23:27, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then, how can I have a contact with another administrator?Agre22 (talk) 23:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Please see the template that I have previously placed upon your page in relation to this block. You will note that there is a section giving instructions with regards appealing a block. Follow those instructions - and an administrator will come to your page in due course.--VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 23:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem remains. I went to many pages of administrators and I didn't found any e-mail to send a message. What I can do?Agre22 (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

You don't need to send an email to anybody to ask for your block to be reviewed. This can simply be done, as the block message states, by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} right here on your talk page, removing "your reason here" and stating the reasons you feel you should be unblocked. According to Wikipedia policy the review will then be conducted by a neutral administrator. It is recommended that you read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks first before doing this. Orderinchaos 07:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found my password writen in a book yesterday. Even so, I remains blocked. I did dozens of articles for wikipedia. For what?Agre22 (talk) 13:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Proposed deletions

The article Woman and the New Race has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, unreferenced

The article Thomas John Gerrard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

The article Silas Malafaia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

The article Luiz Carlos Alborghetti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ryan4314 (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't do nothing with these articles. I remains blocked.Agre22 (talk) 13:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sônia Hernandes

The article Sônia Hernandes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to Estevam Hernandes, no assertion of independent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ryan4314 (talk) 12:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't do nothing, because I'm blocked forever.Agre22 (talk) 12:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Talk:USS Maine (ACR-1)

The talk about USS Maine (ACR-1) is very weak, but I can't do nothing. Agre22 (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Why don't you post your thoughts here, maybe someone will stumble across and read them. Ryan4314 (talk) 18:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You just wrote an answer. You just wrote a joke.Agre22 (talk) 18:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Pivot of Civilization

The article The Pivot of Civilization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is almost completely unmaintained (only six edits in the six months since its original author was indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia), almost completely unlinked (only from Eugenics and Margaret Sanger), completely unreferenced (and unlikely to be referenced in the future; I can't find any articles about the book), and almost completely unread (stats.grok.se says it was viewed about three or four times a day last month). The original author of this article appears to have written it as a way to push their POV that Margaret Sanger was evil. As a result of these circumstances, the article is of very poor quality; aside from its grammatical errors, before my recent edit, it entirely failed to mention the main subject of the book it's ostensibly written about, which is birth control (or, as Sanger wrote, Birth Control.) Given the non-notability of the book, as manifested by all of these circumstances and by the fact that the book has only four reviews on Amazon despite having been published 88 years ago, it is very unlikely that anyone will ever take the trouble to bring this article up to Wikipedia standards.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kragen Javier Sitaker (talk) 02:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The source of article about João Gurgel

I found this article: English. Was this site the source that you found to write the article about João do Amaral Gurgel ? Gram78 (talk) 17:21, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Gram78[reply]

Well, I'm a Brazilian and the article English is correct, but it wasn't my source to write my article about João do Amaral Gurgel . Agre22 (talk) 19:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Talk:Dalkon Shield

Hello, Agre22. You have new messages at Talk:Dalkon Shield.
Message added 02:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Estevam Hernandes

The article Estevam Hernandes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not follow WP biography notability guidelines. In addition, there is poor referencing and sources, and lack of information on this person to constitute a Wiki page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tseung Kwan O (talk) 11:06, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

atk talkpgtopic

hi , billcat bias attacking me , i corrected a link also removing useless offensive reply by a 172.193
- ~ MetAlOx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.53.172.65 (talk) 10:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Woman and the New Race

The article Woman and the New Race has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability, no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grupo Inconfidência

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Grupo Inconfidência requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 02:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Extra Alagoas

The article Extra Alagoas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A periodical that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG. The only source in the article is the official website (which appears to possibly be defunct). Searching for sources only brought up a few mentions of the paper, but no actual significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]