User talk:MrVibrating

Tommy Smyth

Please talk to me about your edit. Perhaps we can reach a compromise. I verify he said it. BillMaddock (talk) 02:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, Wikipedia requires that sources be reliable. See WP:V for a complete explanation of the policy, as well as a discussion of what a reliable source is. In short, you or I are not reliable sources. Second, the second sentence I removed ("Lost on Tommy...") makes an unsupported claim about Smyth's correctness. MrVibrating (talk) 03:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you say is fair enough.

I’ll do my homework and see if I can get corroboration.

For what it’s worth, if you Google Tommy Smyth you’ll see a lot of people are disgruntled.

Thx for taking the time to answer me.BillMaddock (talk) 00:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OiNK donation site

No problemo, This sort of sites are discouraged here in wikipedia. I seriously don't understand wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a fund raising site. Thanks for helping. Keep up the good work and welcome to wikipedia. --SkyWalker 05:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, That is right. After a warning is given then if the user does it again. He/She had to reported then action would be taken. --SkyWalker 06:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Denis Baupin

I have tried to take your guidelines into account. Baupin is no particular friend of mine, but he is an important figure on both the French and the international climate/environment scene, and we need a full and fair entry on him. I shall try to provide further references which confirm the points that appear here.

Martial arts

I'd seen some of your edits on a couple of MA pages and wondered if you would be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts --Nate1481(^t/_c) 11:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll take a look at it. MrVibrating (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom elections

Hi, I indented your vote for the second time, as you need 150 mainspace edits before november 1st in order to vote. I hope you don't mind. Thanks Secret ^account 22:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pitzer College Site

You seem to have made some fairly biased editing of the pitzer site, such as removing over half of the "noteable alumni" list because you said they were not noteable. That is a personal decision and does not reflect the fact that the alumni listed were Pitzer graduates and were in fact worthy of note for current jobs, accomplishments or publications. I added back in the list you deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rory Reiff (talk • contribs) 16:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my edit summaries I noted that I was removing people without articles. My edits weren't arbitrary: I removed everyone w/o an article and kept everyone w/ one. Please see Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Lists_of_people, which states that the same criteria for having an article apply to people in such lists. MrVibrating (talk) 17:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sport Aerobics "unverified content"

Hi,

I don't think the whole section you deleted are unverified contents. Some of them are based on the experience of many authors. They just described the truth of that sport and their feelings to the status of that sport. They just reflected the truth, like "some people considered...". How can you claim that they are "unverified claims"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.118.38.178 (talk) 07:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not they're true or based on the experience of many people isn't what matters. They're unverified because they aren't backed up by citations from reliable sources. See wikipedia's policy on verifiability for more information. Remember, even if it's true it still has to be backed up. MrVibrating (talk) 15:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MrVibrating. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MrVibrating. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]