Jump to content

Talk:Greenbelt, Maryland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photos

[edit]

I have uploaded numerous photos. They can be found in the Greenbelt, Maryland category. If you want any specific photos, just let me know. --Thisisbossi 18:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

source of the text in quotes is requested

[edit]

The quote describing Greenbelt's origins as an experiment in American socialism does not seem neutral on the subject. Does this quote represent someone's opinion of the nature of the project, and if so, whose? or is the creation of Greenbelt officially defined or described as such? Will the author please identify the source so one can examine the context and form an opinion of whether the quotation represents an appropriate and neutral way to characterize the creation of Greenbelt. Thanks. MoBear 07:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greenbelt came about as part of the New Deal and was indeed an attempt by the Federal government to try their hand at the planning and operation of an entire city. [1] The only catch is that at the time, socialism tended to be a purely Communistic term insinuating absolute control over everything -- including micromanagement of residences and businesses. However, today, socialism tends to have a broader definition that can include governments that simply provide a number of social programs -- of which I would say Greenbelt certainly classifies as an attempt at just that. Hope that helps! --Thisisbossi 12:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Greenbelt md flag.gif

[edit]

Image:Greenbelt md flag.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DoJ Investigation

[edit]

Where should information about the recent Department of Justice investigation go in the article? I moved it out of the history section. Does it need it's own section? Also, it's a developing story. Should it be listed as breaking news? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.156.129.121 (talk) 12:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems unusual to track news stories on Wikipedia. If you feel a need to do so, I would think a separate article would be more appropriate. Under the heading of "Government", one expects to find a description of Greenbelt's government. –Uïfareth Cúthalion (talk) 23:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Dispute - Government section

[edit]

The "Government" section does not describe Greenbelt's government. It instead presents one side of a volatile current issue. According to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, "All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources." –Uïfareth Cúthalion (talk) 23:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll steer clear of noting any POV issues, but I do think this is the section it should probably be located (assuming it's agreed that it is notable; personally I think it may be a notable issue). I agree that the government section itself needs to have the basic information that goes into that section. I welcome others to have at it: those type of edits don't interest me in the least. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 23:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The DoJ investigation part seems pretty neutral to me. It states just the facts. The town of Port Chester faced similar issues, and an entry is included here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Chester#Legal_challenges_to_Port_Chester.27s_electoral_system The title of the section seems a bit misleading. How about following the lead from the Port Chester article and calling it "Investigation of Greenbelt's electoral system"?
I have significantly expanded this area of the article, first by creating a meaningful "Government" section, and second by expanding the coverage of the election issue, with numerous citations. Given the number of investigations covered by the DOJ, I question the notability of the mere announcement of a DOJ investigation, and so I have expanded the issue to include the election reform proposals under discussion in the community. My hope is that this expansion will avoid the earlier POV issues by giving a broader perspective rather than one specific viewpoint. Spril4 (talk) 20:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Aerial view, March 1937, Greenbelt under construction

I came to this page as a result of finding the image at right during some unrelated searches in the Library of Congress photo archive. I thought it might be useful here and loaded it up to Commons and have used it in the article. I noticed other images on the main article page were a bit cluttered and created an image gallery.--Goldsztajn (talk) 01:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A class

[edit]

I think this article has improved greatly over the last 2 years, and meets the criteria for both B class and A class. Please post a note here letting me know whether you agree with re-rating the article to A class. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 07:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updated income stats

[edit]

Income stats are listed for the 2000 census but not the 2010 census.72.84.138.251 (talk) 16:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Top Employers

[edit]

What is the reason that Goddard Space Flight Center is not listed here? Nyth83 (talk) 21:26, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Famous Residents

[edit]

Research should be done to determine if anyone from History of the Goddard Space Flight Center#People was or is a resident and then added here. Nyth83 (talk) 21:33, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nearby Private Schools

[edit]

I would like to remove "Nearby private schools that serve Greenbelt include..." and the list of schools that follow, because it strikes me as tangential. Any objections? FlowinEddie (talk) 14:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Census data

[edit]

The data for 1940 is not found in the Census source cited: Under incorporated areas there is a Greenbelt town with 2769 inhabitants. TEDickey (talk) 14:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greenbelt Historic District

[edit]

Hello! Does anyone feel this page would benefit greatly from establishing a "landmarks" tab and including the Greenbelt Historic District under that, rather than burying it in another part of the page?

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Greenbelt, Maryland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Greenbelt, Maryland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greenbelt, Maryland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Greenbelt,_Maryland&oldid=1211366011"