Talk:Great Lakes Basin

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Ontario / Geography Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Great Lakes Basin is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Limnology and Oceanography Mid‑importance

	Oceans portal This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indiana Mid‑importance

Great Lakes Basin is within the scope of WikiProject Indiana, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for, and sustain comprehensive coverage of the U.S. state of Indiana and related subjects on Wikipedia.

IndianaWikipedia:WikiProject IndianaTemplate:WikiProject IndianaIndiana articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can do:
WikiProject Indiana alerts Requested Reassessments Indiana articles needing assessed Indiana cleanup listing Articles needing infoboxes Articles needing attention To-do Lists Articles needing images

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ohio Mid‑importance

	Ohio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 8 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vonderk4.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Basin" map is slightly different than watershed

The maps include some area downstream of Lake Ontario along the seaway which is a part of the St. Lawrence watershed but does not drain into the great lakes. I think that this map shows the actual watershed / drainage area: [1]. I added a sentence to soften the given "basin = watershed" definition to reconcile the conflict. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 19:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Feb 21st, 2018 map change fixed the problem. North8000 (talk) 18:27, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Lakes Basin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151101103624/http://www.ec.gc.ca/grandslacs-greatlakes/default.asp?lang=En&n=B4E65F6F-1 to https://www.ec.gc.ca/grandslacs-greatlakes/default.asp?lang=En&n=B4E65F6F-1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Importance of nuclear plants?

What is the point of the isolated statement "The influence of these power plants and the waste they produce must be combined to ascertain the impact on the Great Lakes Basin?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by ExpatSalopian (talk • contribs) 20:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right.....it sort of says nothing. Maybe we should look through the given source to see if there's anything useful in there. North8000 (talk) 21:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I took a closer look there are a lot of problems there. The power plant count is unsourced and probably wrong. They appeared to have used that map which was produced by an advocacy organization. As an example, on the cited map there are inclusions that are not "hot spots" and not even in the Great Lakes basin listed as "hot spots" within the basin. Also, the reference was misidentified as being published by the Canadian government. It was written and submitted to the government by an advocacy organization and is posted on a government website. No evidence that it was published by anybody much less the Canadian government. Between your concerns and that I'm going to delete. North8000 (talk) 12:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Going to revert your deletion, as the web address for the document has ".ca" in it which means it comes from the government as only government organizations can use the ".ca".--Mark v1.0 (talk) 13:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies to North8000, I am wrong. it is "gov.ca" that comes from the government. I know there are seven Canadian nuclear plants, so 38 plants does not seem too unreasonable. I will see if there are 31 American, and if there are more than seven in Canada.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 14:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

gc.ca goes to Canada government website, I might still be correct.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca is a government website is it not?--Mark v1.0 (talk) 14:40, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

18 power plants. 18 CANDU reactors in operation in Canada: 8 at Bruce Power, 6 in Pickering, 3 in Darlington, and one in Point Lepreau. https://cna.ca/technology/energy/candu-technology/ --Mark v1.0 (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Point Lepreau is in NB, so a total of 17 reactors I think.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 14:50, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are many many problems with that massive set of additions. Massive undue weight, NPOV problems. And when a government website has a collection of public comments, that does not mean that the website operator is considered to be the creator or editor of the material. Maybe you can find an article elsewhere more suited for that giant list of nuclear plants. And put in a short npov paragraph about nuclear power plants in the basin. It really can't stay as is. North8000 (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes I agree it can not stay as is because the list is too large, but what stays? Are there not nuclear plants in the great lakes basin?--Mark v1.0 (talk) 11:35, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was imagining a compromise of a brief encyclopedic solidly-sourced paragraph. What I actually think is that the article should be limited to simply covering "basin" aspects, not what's in the basin. The latter would include 10's of millions of people, millions of industries, many bodies of water (including the great lakes), lots of land and land uses, ecosystems, an immense amount of human history of what occurred there. All stuff covered in other articles. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 11:50, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is an immense amount of history to the area that can not be included, but a short synopsis timeline can be made. The importance of the power plants being listed is the invisible radiation they can produce and release that can cause cancer and possible immediate death to many people should they explode like Chernobyl or Fukushima . Unlike the example of the listing of car dealerships or ice cream shops in the area.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 12:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do a cheat for a temporary measure to make the article look more presentable by adding a click on drop down menu.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of Nuclear power plants?

IMO it's not a matter of importance, it's a matter of what the article is about. Is it about the basin aspect, or what is contained within the basin? IMO it's the former.North8000 (talk) 17:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason the nuclear plants were built in their locations was for the cooling ability of the lakes. The lakes take the heat (how much heat?) and the pollution they produce. We need a third (or more) party-editor to see if they think nuclear power plants are relevant to the article.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 14:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I not disputing that, my point is that the article is about the basin aspect, not what is contained within the basin. North8000 (talk) 18:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The nuclear entries do seem to stick out like a sore thumb. They don't belong at all. The primary focus of any watershed/basin article is geography, and I fail to see how the number of nuclear plants fits into this. Adding stuff like "$x people live in the watershed" is fine, although not strictly necessary. Adding information about impacts to the water basin is obviously fine, but currently, the article sources one article about one plant and presents it as if the problem is "nuclear power", rather than this one plant. Even then, there isn't a study to show impairment. All the nuclear stuff is WP:undue in this article. It could be included in other, more specific articles (ie: Ottawa River), but here it serves only as a distraction from the geographical content. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 16:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]