Jump to content

Talk:Great Diamond Hoax

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I am a living relative of "John Slack" and you are slightly mistaken. John Slack constructed caskets IN New Mexico and became an undertaker in New Mexico. Documents in my possesion (my great-great-great grandmother documented his events) dicate it so.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.109.206.254 (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Having the documents, you are in a position to make a genuine contribution to the historical record. Please contribute what you know.Plazak 17:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This event was also the subject of the Maverick TV show episode Diamond in the Rough, orig air date 01/26/1958. [1] ----—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkdoyle13 (talkcontribs) 19:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ imdb.com

Money sum discrepancies

[edit]

If they bought all of the diamonds for $35,000, how is it that only a few of them were valued at $150,000 by Tiffany? Is there any documentation of that Tiffany valuation or is it just heresay?Starhistory22 (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 April 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved buidhe 00:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Diamond hoax of 1872Great Diamond Hoax – This historical event has been referenced as a proper name, with uppercase "H". The year does not appear to be essential since this is the sole diamond hoax sufficiently notable to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. If consensus skews towards the short main header, Diamond Hoax or the main header that reflects the book title, The Great Diamond Hoax of 1872, I would also support either of those forms. — Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 05:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.