User talk:Starhistory22

Welcome!

Hello, Starhistory22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Elmo “Pop” Haney, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ///EuroCarGT 03:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elmo “Pop” Haney

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elmo “Pop” Haney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ///EuroCarGT 03:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Starhistory22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Elmo “Pop” Haney have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bluefist ^talk 03:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just deleted the article and then restored it based on your explanations on the talk page. However, you can't expect other wikipedians to do your work for you. Articles shouldn't be placed in the main encyclopedia until they're ready. So I'm moving the content to your user space. You can find it here. Deb (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "The Bird japanese guard"

A page you created, The Bird japanese guard, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. TRL (talk) 01:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zio-punks epithet

If you ever used this term[1] or anything similar again and I find out about it, I will block you. Interesting that it took you 4 or 5 minutes to read the first paragraph. Talk pages are also not forums (something I'm not sure you realise), and certainly not for attacks on an ethnic group.[2] Doug Weller (talk) 12:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Emmett Till. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Keyenejad (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Keyenejad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sarah Keyenejad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Starhistory22! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Keyenejad (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Keyenejad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sarah Keyenejad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 00:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nagatomo Speech

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Nagatomo Speech, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Loved150 (talk) 00:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Starhistory22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24162 was submitted on Mar 04, 2019 12:12:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Starhistory22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The accusation is invalid. I am not "racist" and have never been "racist." I married an individual from a different race. The single-minded editor who made the false accusation apparently does not understand the nature of intellectual philosophical questioning and challenging, particularly for unconventional or unpopular ideas.

Decline reason:

Let me quote from one of your edits. "Why are blacks and particularly black females so immoral"[3] If you think comments like this are not racist, and if you think comments like this are appropriate for Wikipedia, you are sorely mistaken. Yamla (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Today, I wanted to help Wikipedia by posting on a PLANT, for Godsakes! This is the same as if some (unqualified and marginal) Wiki "editor" banned Einstein for writing that Jews, on average, have a higher IQ score than other groups, which is TRUE. Would Einstein be "racist" for writing an observed fact? The FACT -- not "racist" or parochial or biased or discriminatory -- is that black females, at least in the United States, have 75% of their children out of wedlock. How, in any literate and rational sense and historical use of the word in the English language, can that not be "immoral"? My original comment is ACCURATE, both mathematically and linguistically. Do you, as an editor, even KNOW what a "moral" or "morality" is? I don't think you do. Which is why you are unqualified to be doing any "blocking" and incapable of being an "editor" (of which I have more than 20 years' experience)! Whereas, I am a published author and scholar in the United States. This kind of low-brow treatment will work to the detriment and ultimate degradation and embarrassment of Wikipedia. There are already NO respectable colleges and universities that allow the use of Wikipedia (directly because of "blocking" actions like this one -- you really can't censor in honest academia)! Do you want Wikipedia to become further degraded and a laughing stock? I have always liked the idea and the convenience of the Wikipedia service and have actively supported it, but this treatment is tyrannical ... off the scale for literate men and women. Shame on Wikipedia for placing such people in "control" of blocking and "administration." It is an embarrassment all around ... as time will show. Starhistory22 (talk) 23:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. WP:UTRS remains available to you. --Yamla (talk) 10:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They never see it. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #75120

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]