Talk:Gobliiins
Woodruff
[edit]Woodruff isn't really part of the 'Gobliiins' series...it could possibly deserve it's own page. Since I seem to be one of the few people on Earth who've actually played and absolutely loved it, I could try to make a nice, detailed one... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.254.178.62 (talk) 07:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Based on the title, I think that Woodruff isn't part of the Gobliiins series (though I haven't played the game). But because the article asserts that it's debatable, I strenuously object to it being removed without debate. What say you all? Is it similar enough to the Gobliiins series to be even an honorary member of the series, or should it be removed entirely? DOSGuy (talk) 17:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's not part of the Gobliiins series. Any similarity is only due to the fact that these games were developed by the same guys. The official Goblins 4 site doesn't even mention it: http://www.gobliiins4.com/Historique.htm . Pauca sed bona (talk) 21:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- I happen to agree with you, but it's a debatable opinion. Why do you object to seeking consensus? What harm could there be? DOSGuy (talk) 02:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's not called Goblins, it doesn't have any goblins in it, MobyGames doesn't include it as part of the Gobliiins series...so I've removed it from this article. It has its own WikiPedia entry, so no information is being lost. Sjc196 (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Woodruff is indeed not part of series. I`m a big gobliiins-series fan, and I managed to solve it almost to the end and must say: design, concepts and overall feel are pretty different from Gobliiins-series, even if graphics are similar. 81.173.172.162 (talk) 09:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's not called Goblins, it doesn't have any goblins in it, MobyGames doesn't include it as part of the Gobliiins series...so I've removed it from this article. It has its own WikiPedia entry, so no information is being lost. Sjc196 (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- I happen to agree with you, but it's a debatable opinion. Why do you object to seeking consensus? What harm could there be? DOSGuy (talk) 02:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Gobliiins 4
[edit]Stop reverting w/o giving a reason as to why. Or I will have to report you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.12.65 (talk) 19:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Goblins 3 spoiler
[edit]Why is there a spoiler at the end of the Goblins 3 section without any context? 80.99.221.200 (talk) 23:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
CD format "exteneded" versions
[edit]About this info:
All games are available in CD format. The first three include voices instead of the "goblinish" talk that featured on the floppy disk versions. The CD version also censors the nudity featured in the original game.
Has anyone actually seen these CD versions with "real voices" and censored out nudity? A reference maybe? --SBerT (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Gobliiins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://amr.abime.net/amr_popup_picture.php?src=amiga_user_int%2Fmagscans%2Faui_1993_04_07-04%2F074.jpg&c=54860&n=1&filesize=409158
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://amr.abime.net/amr_popup_picture.php?src=amiga_action%2Fmagscans%2Faa40_1993_01%2F055.jpg&c=54860&n=1&filesize=422777
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://amr.abime.net/amr_popup_picture.php?src=amiga_computing%2Fmagscans%2Fac057_1993_02%2F134.jpg&c=54860&n=1&filesize=394683
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://amr.abime.net/amr_popup_picture.php?src=cu_amiga%2Fmagscans%2Fcu_1993_01%2F056.jpg&c=54860&n=1&filesize=413324
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://amr.abime.net/amr_popup_picture.php?src=amiga_user_int%2Fmagscans%2Faui_1994_03_08-03%2F078.jpg&c=54860&n=1&filesize=416752
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://amr.abime.net/review_7654
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://amr.abime.net/amr_popup_picture.php?src=cu_amiga%2Fmagscans%2Fcu_1994_02%2F073.jpg&c=54860&n=1&filesize=400029
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gobliiins4.com/inscrire.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070426023828/http://www.gobliiins4.com/ to http://www.gobliiins4.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)