Talk:Glover (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Bejeweled Stars (1 participant)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Instructions

Why are there level discriptions and instructions on here? This isn't a guide.

Tense

This article switches tenses quite often. If I'm not mistaken, it should all be in present tense. --Thatkidsam 01:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The game guide nature of the article

The Balls, Levels and Trivia sections were recently removed, but the balls and levels section should be there but in a summerised form and the trivia section should also be maintained. I have added in a summery of the former balls section and readded the trivia section. I think a summery of the former level section should also be added, I will attemp to do it. Unless there is a reason for the rewrote sections to be taken down they should be left as they should not be "guide" like anymore. The Light6 06:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay/Balls

The Gameplay and balls section provide the same information, and the Metllic ball's name is inconsistant throughout these two sections. Chugger1992 18:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing citations

The article lacks citations for most (all) of its text. Anyone object to a "missing references" tag for the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CCFreak2K (talk • contribs) 03:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]