Talk:Global Agenda

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Info

I know this needs a lot more info, hence the stub --LordAdmiralDeath 10:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it still needs core information about the game design. From the article itself I learn that there are various weapons and avatar classes. From the infobox I gather that this is a multiplayer TPS (should be in the main text), but I still know nothing about the object of the game and its main features.

So what's the object of the game - FFA or CTF or what? Do players shoot at players or bots? Do they score points or achieve mission goals or just survive? Do they work together or against one another or both? Is it set in an open or enclosed world? etc... Skrofler (talk) 18:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot

Silly ClueBot, stop protecting the vandalism! Xjph (talk) 09:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Someone put this page up for deletion, it is obviously a mock page and serves no purpose on Wikipedia. I don't personally know how to put up a speedy delete requestKilikman (talk) 13:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I take it you meant version of the article? The solution in a case of vandalism like this is to revert to the previous clean version, not delete the article. It's since been cleaned up, obviously. --Ihmhi (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Game Studios?

I can't find anything saying that Global Agenda is published by Microsoft Game Studios. In fact, it's on steam and is using steam as its primary method of distribution. If it was published by Microsoft, I feel that they would use Games for Windows Live: Microsoft's competing service. This game isn't even offered on Microsoft's service. --Louis C. (talk) 03:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subscription information section

A lot of users have been adding codes to this section. Wikipedia is, first of all, not a guide, and second of all, not a place to promote yourself. Apparently, getting people to use these codes grants the people who added them items ingame, so, it's basically players trying to spam the article. Remove any revisions that look like this[1]. Eik Corell (talk) 11:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Global Agenda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dead game, when was it shut down?

Would it be a good idea to rewrite all statements from present to past tense? Meaning is → was. Sincerely, •ː• 3ICE •ː• 14:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]