Talk:Game design document

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 808TR777. Peer reviewers: Brontyjn.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Game Design Document in capitals

Just in case someone's wondering -- I'm not sure why, but everyone (all my "sources") seem to use the first letter capitalization, even though "design document" alone is never capitalized. — H3llkn0wz ▎talk 02:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind.— H3llkn0wz ▎talk 01:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Process of GDD

For the article, I plan to include the process of making a GDD. I think this will be helpful information and give a bit more insight the way it is structured. (808TR777 (talk) 00:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC))[reply]

More steps are to be added weekly. (808TR777 (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC))[reply]

You have to use multiple reliable sources for this like those at WP:VG/RS. www.gamedesigning.org is not a reliable source as far as I can tell. I don't see who the authors are or what their credentials are. There's no editorial team and none of the other things one would expect of a reliable source. Their About Us looks like a cookie cutter blog page and inspires no confidence.

I won't remove your addition, but you need to properly source if we want to keep it. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changed To Adding Information on Game Concept

Since I could not find much on my recent idea, I have decided to provide the information on the Game Concept part of the document. This information is also coming from the Gamasutra article. There is a bit of information from that article that can be added, and I think this would be helpful to add. 808TR777 (talk) 21:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]