Talk:Fortress (cancelled video game)

Fortress (cancelled video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Fortress (cancelled video game) is part of the Final Fantasy XII series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 26, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
January 5, 2010	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
March 7, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GamesIndustry.biz, Computer and Video Games, and Official Xbox Magazine

GamesIndustry.biz, Computer and Video Games, and Official Xbox Magazine are reliable sources. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 07:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's mentioned above is mostly just rumours and speculation. Surely the game was in the works as mentioned in the interview, but, at the same time, the latter clearly states that Square Enix did not want this game to show up. In addition, Eidos Montreal official website doesn't list this game as being in development. Postwar (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it doesn't list it, it's an unnannounced and unconfirmed game. The nature of what's mentioned above is duely noted in this article (in other words, there are only sentences like "an alleged tech demo (...) The video description stated (...) a possible new home (...)", etc., and no sentences like "It's a fact that Eidos is...", etc.). So please stop removing these reliable sources from the article. First you claimed these sources were not reliable, then you claimed that these sources didn't exist (sic)... This is making little sense. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 11:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Then I'll just rearrange the article a little bit and restore the links you've deleted. Postwar (talk) 12:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Developer name

I started a requested move for GRIN (company) which may impact the name of this article. --Mika1h (talk) 17:35, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The proposal is here: Talk:GRIN_(company)#Requested move.--Mika1h (talk) 17:36, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New info

NeoGAF thread, corroborated by Polygon. There are a few interesting revelations here (ex, "we did not even know what game/brand it was until the very last two months") and if you do incorporate them, please cite the original source as a primary source and NOT the NeoGAF thread. That said, many thanks to DiipuSurotu for compiling this information in one place. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Used it! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]