Talk:Forge of Freedom: The American Civil War

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Forge of Freedom: The American Civil War article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Forge of Freedom: The American Civil War" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Proposed Deletion of Page

I'm not sure why this page is being tagged for deletion. Two months ago, there was a warning that "Notability" had to be demonstrated, so I added third-party links, and someone else did some editing. There are numerous pages for other games that don't get flagged for deletion (including the product that competes directly with this one), so why single it out? Anyway, I am about to rework the entry so that it reads more like a standard Wikipedia page (right now it's a series of facts that don't form a coherent entry), so perhaps that and the third-party evidence will suffice to show that this page should be retained. Gil1970 (talk) 16:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Gil1970, May 10, 2008[reply]