Jump to content

Talk:Final Fantasy Type-0 HD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleFinal Fantasy Type-0 HD has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starFinal Fantasy Type-0 HD is part of the Final Fantasy Type-0 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2015Good article nomineeListed
July 16, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Final Fantasy Type-0 HD/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take this. Basically I might change my style of reviews now, so I'll see how it goes with this one. JAGUAR  21:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found.

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "while the Steam port was released in August 2015" - link game port
    "and performed on bass guitar and drums respectively" - comma needed
    "The Blu-ray album reached #189 in the Oricon charts, and remained for one week" - link this to the Japanese charts
    "The album, and music in general, have received positive comments from music critics and reviewers of the game" - if you plan on taking this to FA, I'd recommend fleshing out the critics' comments
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References check out OK, reliable sources, no evidence of OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Sufficient detail for a recently discovered extra-solar object
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Stable, no edit warring
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No images used
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This article meets the criteria so I am happy to promote it. JAGUAR  22:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on Final Fantasy Type-0 HD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]