Talk:Fahad Shaikh

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 October 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

Hello there,

This page should not be speedily deleted because it's currently work in progress and I need sometime to fix as it is important and I will make it verifiable enough, thank you for the support Fadushake (talk) 02:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You should create a draft in your WP:SANDBOX before moving it to the mainspace. Meatsgains^(talk) 02:53, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because I need some time to work on it and I will be providing proper source/citations --Fadushake (talk) 11:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additional citations and unreliable sources

Saqib, please specify which claims need additional citations and which sources you find unreliable? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References 5, 9, 10, and 12 are clearly unreliable sources. Meanwhile half of the filmography table remains unsourced. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do Something Haute, BOL News or The Current get highlighted in red in the CiteHighlighter script or was there a previous discussion in RSN that deems them unreliable? If not, I believe they can be used to merely check their involvement in the TV series. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeraxmoira, I suggest reviewing the sources yourself to assess their reliability and if the sources are found unreliable, they should not be used, regardless of whether the article is a BLP or not, and whether the content is controversial or not. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are also evaluated based on how, where and in what context they are being used. Don’t remove sources if you can’t justify why they are being removed. And, please don’t ask the community or other editors to review the sources themselves when the onus is on the editor who adds the maintenance tags to explain why they are being added. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeraxmoira, It only takes a couple of minutes to check that BOL was deemed unreliable at RSN and Something Haute is a WordPress blog, as noted in this article. The same can be said for The Current. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something Haute and The Current can be used to verify his involvement in the TV series as they are uncontroversial. BOL cannot be deemed unreliable based on a rough consensus from a single discussion that wasn’t closed. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fahad Shaikh - Hollywood Film Institute

Libraa2019, the Fahad Shaikh who graduated from the Hollywood Film Institute is a different person. Please do not change the invisible comment. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeraxmoira, Yes i thought someone is trying to portray that this source does'nt belong to actor but only hollywood thing in this source is incorrect. Thank You for this as i've research and found that this article was initially belong to filmmaker and mentioned same at AFD. Libraa2019 (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]