Talk:F29 Retaliator

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Fair use rationale for Image:F29Retaliator.jpg

Image:F29Retaliator.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad link

Please do not link to russian (.ru) abandonware sites. It's bad policy. Please remove the link. 212.149.254.226 (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the soundtrack "infamous"?

Personally I like it. Wikipedia should be NPOV 86.25.136.178 (talk)

Agreed. Have deleted half this article which was basically a critical review of the game. Not suitable for Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.64.147.163 (talk) 22:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Game Endings

How to get each ending? It depends on previous missions or just random? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.217.65 (talk) 21:39, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The endings depends on the force balance. The more missions player completes, the better is military situation in next day. Also (basing on the PC version of the game), I find the description of endings inaccurate: - Intercepting the nuclear cruise missile happens when enemy is seriously beaten (the player completed most of the missions each day). Last day mission text is like "The enemy situation is critical with their land and aerial forces smashed/. Three enemy fighters are secorting a nuclear cruise missile (...)". On the completion, the ending text is like "The war is won. But mankind has lost" - the background is a ruined Saint Basil's Cathedral in Moscow). - Fighting 12 enemy figters happens when the forces are ballanced (the player completed majority of the missions but not all) - and the ending text is like "The war is over. Peace terms have beed agreed". - Strike on the enemy HQ happens when enemy have he upper hand (The player completed smallest or close to smallest number of missions possible) - as a last desperate attempt to turn the ballance. After completing the mission the ending text is like "The war is over. Mankind has lost" - the background is ruined Statue of Liberty.

So, "Hand Shake" scenario does not like "enemy defeat" - rather it is like "peace negotiated". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.36.193.191 (talk) 19:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]