Jump to content

Talk:Edmund McMillen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Games Developed

[edit]

His Games Developed is partially incorrect. SMB:TG has been pushed back to after Mewgenics. Changing it to TBD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.1.220.85 (talk) 06:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: role in Braid

[edit]

To the IP addresses making edits around McMillen's role in Braid: I believe you may be correct in your assertions. However, Wikipedia is not remotely concerned with truth - only verifiability. The source cited in the article is unambiguous: "I was also the character artist and animator for Braid" - a direct quote. If you feel that that claim is not correct, the way forward is not to delete this claim from the article, but rather find a source supporting your viewpoint and cite it. With such a source, you could change the text to something like, "Although McMillen claims to have been the character artist and animator for Braid, [source X] says [contrary position]." Hope that helps. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Indented line: Not remotely concerned with truth? I don't think that's what you meant to say... 99.6.157.136 (talk) 04:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It absolutely is a hundred percent exactly what he means to say. It is wikipedia policy. Verifiability, Not Truth. Isn't it lovely? (Spoiler: No. No, it isn't.) 74.36.12.242 (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Edmund McMillen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]