Talk:DragonFable

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Delete, 31 January 2010, see discussion.
Speedy delete, 23 December 2006, see discussion.
Delete, 8 June 2006, see discussion.
Delete, 18 April 2006, see discussion.
Delete, 16 March 2006, see discussion.
Delete, 28 January 2006, see discussion.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Plot

I'm starting to worry about the plot section. I know DragonFable's storyline is split into zones and can't be simplified easily without losing major details, but I don't think the article should have a whole page's worth of info onto its plot. Harry Blue5 (talk) 13:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will agree with you here, Harry. Perhaps there should just be general notes about the gameplay itself instead, vaguely covering sagas, classes, and so on? >Wyndaeru (talk) 08:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition to revert recent additions by Superfighter

I propose we revert back to this revision. Listing every class is WP:GAMEGUIDE-ish and, once you remove the whole tips things, how they're unlocked and where their unlocked, there is no way there could be a section for each class. Also, the plot is far to long, and shoud be condensed into a single section, as in the previous revision. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Not much else to it. Eik Corell (talk) 22:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problem in Gameplay Section

On the very first paragraph of the Gameplay there are some bad words that were possibly changed from the original text. As I do not feel like having the authority to edit them myself, I decided to just notify you guys about it. --ArturBenthos (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DragonFable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131003044509/http://uk.gamespot.com/dragon-fable/platform/webonly/ to http://uk.gamespot.com/dragon-fable/platform/webonly/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]