Talk:Don't Take It Personally, Babe, It Just Ain't Your Story

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Don't Take It Personally, Babe, It Just Ain't Your Story article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Don't Take It Personally, Babe, It Just Ain't Your Story" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1

Video games: Indie / Visual novels Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Bejeweled Stars (1 participant)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Don't Take It Personally, Babe, It Just Ain't Your Story has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 17, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 23, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Don't take it personally, babe, it just ain't your story has been described as a profoundly moving video game about love, sex and the internet?

On 15 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Don't take it personally, babe, it just ain't your story to Don't Take It Personally, Babe, It Just Ain't Your Story. The result of the discussion was moved.

Name of the subject of the article

The article's title is Don't Take It Personally, Babe, It Just Ain't Your Story. However, the beginning of the article uses lowercase letters only. Meanwhile, most sections use begin with "Don't take me personally..." Shouldn't there be some kind of uniformity in letter case for the subject of this article? The Average Wikipedian (talk) 13:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It used to be lowercase; the move and rationale was: 18:08, April 4, 2014‎ Status (talk | contribs | block)‎ m . . (4,057 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Status moved page Talk:Don't take it personally, babe, it just ain't your story to Talk:Don't Take It Personally, Babe, It Just Ain't Your Story: No stylizations in article titles (WP:TITLE)) --Pres N 14:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in favor of moving it back, though. --Pres N 14:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in favor of moving it back too. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 06:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 April 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works (contribs) 15:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't take it personally, babe, it just ain't your story → Don't Take It Personally, Babe, It Just Ain't Your Story – Undiscussed move violates WP:TITLECAPS policy ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 11:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment Just noting this was moved in 2019, and Talk:Don't_take_it_personally,_babe,_it_just_ain't_your_story#Name_of_the_subject_of_the_article. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  It was created at lower case in 2011, moved to upper case in 2014, and back to lower case in 2019. This probably needs a RM. Station1 (talk) 17:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The lower case title in the screen illustration is just a font choice and not the true title. Just like the title of this book is not PET SEMETARY. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 21:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  Probably true, but since it's already been moved and reverted once and discussed on the talk page, it's probably best to finally settle it through a full discussion. Station1 (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As a composition title, it should follow TITLECAPS. The styling of the title on the actual product is irrelevant. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:21, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.