Talk:Don't Buy This

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (3 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (12 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Huh?

CRASH gave it 39.333333%[2] hence the game's title.

I feel I'm being dense, but I don't understand. Can someone explain this? Optimus Sledge (talk) 18:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As in you shouldn't buy it (title reads "Don't Buy This") because it got such an awful rating. Wow I hope noone ever discovers I was reading this article :P hehehehe Geqo (talk) 04:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The vague phrasing makes it appear that CRASH's review led to the naming of the game, or something of that nature. I'll see what I can do to make it clearer. Reach Out to the Truth (talk) 16:41, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the review thoroughly, I have decided to remove CRASH's review from the Reception section. The review was written as a joke and I couldn't find anything that could be treated as proper criticism. Reach Out to the Truth (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyright

Hmm would the statement in the manual "Firebird disowns all copyright in this product. It may be copied, lent, hired or transmitted at will." count as a free licence release? while it fails to mention allowing derivative works " disowns all copyright" would cover that.©Geni 22:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

I think that this needs to be written a little less like it was based on Ashen's review on "Terrible Games You've Probably Never Heard Of". This is an encyclopedia article, not a biting stab at a bunch of poor programmers. --72.215.154.250 (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don't Buy This. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.worldofspectrum.org/pub/sinclair/games-info/d/DontBuyThis.txt
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020320214458/http://www.sincuser.f9.co.uk/040/sftwreb.htm to http://www.sincuser.f9.co.uk/040/sftwreb.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]