Talk:Great Diamond Hoax

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I am a living relative of "John Slack" and you are slightly mistaken. John Slack constructed caskets IN New Mexico and became an undertaker in New Mexico. Documents in my possesion (my great-great-great grandmother documented his events) dicate it so.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.109.206.254 (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Having the documents, you are in a position to make a genuine contribution to the historical record. Please contribute what you know.Plazak 17:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This event was also the subject of the Maverick TV show episode Diamond in the Rough, orig air date 01/26/1958. ^[1] ----—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkdoyle13 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ imdb.com

Money sum discrepancies

If they bought all of the diamonds for $35,000, how is it that only a few of them were valued at $150,000 by Tiffany? Is there any documentation of that Tiffany valuation or is it just heresay?Starhistory22 (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 April 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved b uidhe 00:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond hoax of 1872 → Great Diamond Hoax – This historical event has been referenced as a proper name, with uppercase "H". The year does not appear to be essential since this is the sole diamond hoax sufficiently notable to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. If consensus skews towards the short main header, Diamond Hoax or the main header that reflects the book title, The Great Diamond Hoax of 1872, I would also support either of those forms. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rreagan007 (talk) 05:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. ~ HAL 333 23:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The 1872 date should be kept to show its place in history even though there are no other Great Diamond Hoaxes. The Great Diamond Hoax of 1872 is also the name used by the Smithsonian magazine article and website for this event.RockDoc485 (talk) 00:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[1] .com

[1]