Jump to content

Talk:Delhi Belly (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There is nothing about this in IMDb. JohnCD (talk) 19:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is IMDB the sole criteria to judge what should be Wikipedia or not? There are scores of relevant news articles about Delhi Belly on the internet? How come IMDB's not having something get precedence over them? Crackjack (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • OK, I apologise - IMDb evidently doesn't cover Bollywood well - and I've taken off the "hoax" tag. But it's still too early for an article, till shooting is confirmed to have started. JohnCD (talk) 20:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All points for deletion of this article has been addressed. Removing the deletion message Crackjack (talk) 17:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Credible sources

[edit]

We are trying to find a credible source for the following phrase Akshat had to compile 15 drafts before the movie went on the floor. It took him more than 3 years to finish writing the story. We have seen the following 3 sources till now. 1 (rojakhan.com), 2 (indianentertainment.info) and 3 (glamsham.com) 1 is a personal blog which just links to 2. 2 seems to have an authentic interview with Akshat Verma but the site doesn't seem credible. The About Us page itself does not inspire confidence. Alexa details also are not helping. 3; Glamsham.com for starters is already linked by 260+ wikipedia articles and has much better alexa details. I would like to hear more from other editors. Anshuk (talk) 20:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First of all my apologies for a late reply. However I think glamsham will be the best bet, sources are part of journalism, one will have to stick with the credibility of publication and not it's sources. Fanofbollywood (talk) 06:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I agree with Anshuk. I read the Glamsham article and it should not be credible source. They credit the information in the article to so-called "sources" which is questionable. At least, IndianEntertainment has a credible interview and has put itself out there to be discredited. Also, maybe we need to go through Glamsham articles from now onward to check its credibility if all they do is cite to so-called "sources." So having 260 wiki cited articles (which they might have cited themselves) should not inspire total confidence. The articles, the content, the actual source of the information needs to be checked. Another important point is that the Indian Entertainment article was posted 2 days before the Glamsham article. In addition, I checked the alexa link; there's a review of Glamsham that says "this site is nothing but a rehash of content already available on the net elsewhere." --MajorBollywoodFan (talk) 20:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Delhi Belly (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name of the character played by Vijay Raaz

[edit]

The name of the character played by Vijay Raaz is mentioned as Somayajulu. However, nowhere is he referenced by this name in the movie. The end credits lists the character's name as 'Cowboy'. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]