Talk:Death by Degrees

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Melee (game terminology) (0 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

So which boxart?

I assume that the one listed on this page is the US release. The Nina Williams article shows the Japanese box art. So, should we have one, both, or delete one? - Hbdragon88 21:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crossover with Tekken

Needs some grammatical clean-up! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.129.210.61 (talk) 14:27, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

POV

The "reception" entry is almost entirely made from an unverifiable POV, claiming that "the fans" have various opinions on the game. The game receiving mixed reviews is an encyclopedic fat, but the fans thinking that a sequel (that most likely won't ever happen) will be much better than the original has no encyclopedic value. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.37.159.240 (talk) 19:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's been toned down, but the POV problem still remains. The whole "some fans think" is exactly the type of weasel words the Wikipedia policy asks to avoid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.37.154.253 (talk) 19:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Image is a fair use violation. Clearly there the fair use rationale is made is a lie. I placed a better image on it why did delete it? LOTRrules (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explain how the image is a fair use violation. FightingStreet (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"No free Alternative"? There are images on google that have smaller images than this...the fact that the fair use says no free alternative could exist is a clear violation because again there are lots of images with a simple websearch. LOTRrules (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These images that appear on Google are copyrighted by Namco, just like yours or mine. That's what "No free alternative" means. Your image is just as good as mine, but let's use the one that was uploaded first. FightingStreet (talk) 18:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But yours violates the rule. Its proportions are much bigger. Use a smaller one. It'll avoid copyright issues. LOTRrules (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've reduced its size now. FightingStreet (talk) 20:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for listening. LOTRrules (talk) 20:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article too opinionated

Reading through the Gameplay section, it’s written more like a review. 2601:181:C300:6FE0:2D7F:3BDE:CE00:44BE (talk) 04:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]