Talk:Cyclone Tessi

Cyclone Tessi has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 28, 2017. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Cyclone Tessi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 March 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that tree debris from Cyclone Tessi in Townsville, Queensland, was processed into 25,000 m³ (880,000 cu ft) of mulch and used in local botanical gardens?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cyclone Tessi.

Wikipedia

Weather: Tropical / Southern Hemisphere High‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Southern Hemisphere work group (assessed as High-importance).

Australia: Queensland High‑importance

	Australia portal Cyclone Tessi is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Critism

Does this article look big enough and well detailed to not be suggested to be merged back in the Cyclone season article, i put a fair bit of time and effort on this one. -- Gertzy 1st October 2006.

The article looks nice, but if I were you, try to get as much info as possible. From what I have seen around, articles of this length do get merged. RaNdOm26 17:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put it at a start for now, but I think you need to do this to get it to B-class. Make the storm history into 2 or 3 paragraphs, turn that table of yours into sentences, remove the town headers in the impact sections so it's just one big section, and make each town a paragraph, metrication, and finally, you need references using inline sourcing. If you don't know what that is, you do this; for starters, just do <ref name="name">http://www.awebsite.com</ref>. When you get better at it, you can use {{cite web}} and {{cite book}} and {{cite news}} and all those other cool things, you might even be able to pass GA if you do this stuff. Good luck! íslenskur fellibylur #12 _(samtal) 11:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations, better tone, proper capitalisation, WP:MOSDATE, etc. This is a stub, not a start. Too short. – Ch acor 06:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

There isn't enough info to justify the existence of this article. It is also not notable enough, did little damage, and caused no deaths. Merge. – Ch acor 06:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been merged since there isn't a whole lot here that's not in the season article. If more information can be found, add it there, and if a significant amount of information gets found, feel free to recreate. --Core des at (talk) 07:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Tessi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contribs) 21:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"The ninth cyclone and fourth severe tropical cyclone..." - What is a severe tropical cyclone? Link to the scale.

You know darn well what it is, don't play dumb. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"...peaking as a Category 3 tropical cyclone on the Australian cyclone scale..." - And since we've linking above, you can delink here.
"Cyclone Tessi had its origins..." - Not a fan of this wording personally. I'd suggest rewording to "Cyclone Tessi originated from..."
"the Bureau of Meteorology's (BoM) Tropical Cyclone Warning Center in Brisbane identified the system as a tropical low and began issuing gale warnings." - Link gale.

I linked gale warning instead, hope that's OK. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"as it approached the coast at 19 km/h (12 mph)." - Is the specific forward motion necessary here? That changes advisory by advisory, and 12mph isn't exactly notable.

19 km/h sounds a lot faster than 12 mph, though. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Streets on the island were littered with rocks and other debris" - Large rocks, like boulders? Otherwise, I can go to my street or any street and get you a rock lol. Nothing special.

They're minerals, Marie. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And that's it. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 21:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done with everything. Thanks so much for the review! – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]